Web-based investors are more satisfied with their investment firm in 2012 than in 2011, according to the latest J.D. Power and Associates survey. But those who do their investing and trading online are less satisfied with trading charges and fees this year, the study of 3,730-plus investors found.
Overall satisfaction stands at 768 (out of 1,000) in 2012 vs. 764 in the 2011 survey, due to increases in experience with interaction, information resources and account offerings, while satisfaction with trading charges and fees is 697, down from 703 in 2011.
“Overall trading volume has dropped during the past couple of years, and similar to banks, investment firms are looking to compensate for lost revenue with fees,” said David Lo, director of investment services at J.D. Power and Associates, in a press release.
“Contrary to what some believe, this is not necessarily a bad thing, providing that firms are showing value to their investors in terms of resources and tools and ensuring investors clearly understand how and why they’re charged these fees,” he explained.
For the Power Circle Ratings of each firm, J.D. Power breaks it down as such: 5 Stars is Among the Best in the industry, 4 Stars is Better Than Most, 3 Stars is About Average, and 2 Stars is The Rest or below the industry average.
(This year’s study did not rank USAA, which was No. 1 in 2011, due to a number of factors, including its investor membership arrangements.)
10. Merrill Edge (BAC)
Score: 718
2011 Score: 691
Power Circle Rating : 2 stars
9. Wells Fargo (WFC)
Score: 720
2011 Score: 704
Power Circle Rating: 2 stars
8. E*Trade (ETFC)
Score: 769
2011 Score: 763
Power Circle Rating: 3 stars
7. ING Direct/Sharebuilder
Score: 772
2011 Score: 754
Power Circle Rating: 3 stars
6. T. Rowe Price (TROW)
Score: 778