Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Life Health > Health Insurance > Your Practice

At Heart of Health Law Clash, a 1942 Case of a Farmer’s Wheat (New York Times)

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

A 70-year-old precedent involving an Ohio farmer named Roscoe C. Filburn will be the center of arguments when the health care reform law goes before the Supreme Court March 26. Fillburn sued to overturn a 1938 federal law that told him how much wheat he could grow on his family farm and made him pay a penalty for every extra bushel. The 1942 decision against him is the basis for the Supreme Court’s modern understanding of the scope of federal power. To the Obama administration, the Fillburn decision illustrates how much leeway the federal government has to regulate the choices of individuals affecting the national economy. Opponents of the law say the decision set the outer limit of federal power. The Supreme Court ruling against Filburn was unanimous.