Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company has asked the Connecticut Insurance Department for permission to increase rates on several long-term care insurance (LTCI) plans by an average of 32.7%, officials say.
The Connecticut department has posted information about the application on its website.
Connecticut regulators rejected an earlier request for a 32.7% increase that Mutual of Omaha filed in September 2011.
Mutual of Omaha began selling LTCI coverage in 1987, and it issued the policies that would be affected by the increases before 2004.
Mutual of Omaha has 40,497 LTCI policies written on 8 different forms in force throughout the United States, and those policies generate about $76 million in annualized premium revenue, according to the increase application.
Lapse rates for policyholders with issue ages under 80 have been lower than expected, but lapse rates for policyholders with issue ages 80 to 84 are higher than Mutual of Omaha had priced for, and lapse rates for policyholders with issue ages of 80 to 84 who have had policies in effect for 9 years or longer are 210% of what the company had priced for, the company says in the increase application.
Mutual of Omaha representatives note that, because of the relatively small number of policyholders who received policies when ages 80 to 84 and have held their policies for 9 years or longer, the actual-expected results can vary widely for that group.
For non-lifetime benefit, actual claims experience is 18% higher than expected, and, for lifetime benefit, the actual claims experience is 39% higher than expected, company representatives say.
If approved, the new rates would take effect May 1 and be implemented over 2 years. The increases increases for the affected policies would range from 15% to 45%, and the maximum increase in any single year would be 30%.
The company says in its statement that policyholders with lifetime benefits can avoid a premium increase by switching to a 5-year benefit period.
Policyholders also could take steps such as increasing the elimination period, decreasing the maximum daily benefit or dropping optional riders, the company says.
CORRECTION: An earlier version of this article described the statistics broken down by age incorrectly. The statistics broken down by age were for policy lapse rates.