Close Close
Sign In
Newsletters
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
Podcast Center Video Center Webcasts Resource Center Events
About ThinkAdvisor Contact Us Advertise With Us Asset & Logo Licensing Sitemap Terms of Service Privacy Policy Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
ThinkAdvisor

Financial Planning > Charitable Giving > Donor Advised Funds

DAFs on the Carpet: Should They Have Mandatory Payout Rates?

By Michael S. Fischer

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Should Congress impose mandatory payout rates on donor-advised funds, similar to those required of private foundations?

Ray Madoff, a professor at Boston College Law School, says yes. In a recent New York Times op-ed article, she urged Congress to require DAFs “to distribute all of their assets to real public charities within seven years of their contribution.”

Absent such a requirement, she argued, assets in DAFs “can languish in these charitable holding pens for decades or even centuries (these funds are frequently marketed for their ability to allow donors to create a legacy for future generations).”

Madoff identified Fidelity, Schwab and Goldman Sachs as large institutional sponsors of DAFs.

A different perspective on commercial sponsors’ payout rates emerged from a study by The Nonprofit Quarterly last year. It suggested that DAFs managed by large commercial firms pay out at a much faster rate than the 5% required of private foundations, and faster than community foundations.

In an article published Tuesday, the Quarterly quoted from its study: “Between 2003 and 2007, Fidelity’s payout was 23%, Calvert’s 14%, Schwab’s around 20%, and Vanguard’s 21%, compared with an average payout of community foundations surveyed by the Council on Foundations (COF) of 13.1% and a median payout of 9%.”

The article said that a payout floor of 5% for DAFs may be worth examining, but an even higher rate for private foundations should also come under the microscope, as these “control much higher levels of assets than the cumulative assets of DAFs controlled by commercial firms, community foundations, and others.”

Moreover, their payout rate is “laughably small” compared with those of their commercial DAF competitors, it said.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.