California Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones says health insurers in California must cover medically necessary residential care for serious mental illnesses, such as anorexia nervosa, even if the policies exclude coverage for all types of residential care.
An exclusion for all types of residential care may appear to provide parity between mental and medical care, “but the exclusion in fact creates disparity, because residential care is often the only way to treat certain mental illnesses, whereas other options are available for the treatment of other types of illnesses,” Adam Cole, a counsel for Jones, writes in a “friend of the court brief” submitted to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Jones submitted the brief to the court because California officials, lawyers for a patients, and lawyers for employers and insurers are waging a fierce battle over a ruling a 3-judge panel at the 9th Circuit handed down in August in Harlick vs. Blue Shield of California (Number 10-15595).
The plaintiff in the case, Jeanene Harlick, was 37 when the ruling was released and has been dealing with anorexia for years. She spent 10 months in a non-licensed residential facility starting in April 2006.
What Your Peers Are Reading
She was enrolled in an employer-sponsored group health plan when she entered the residential facility.
The federal Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (MHPAEA) applies to a health plan at an employer with more than 50 workers that offers both mental health and medical benefits. The MHPAEA requires affected plans to provide comparable mental health and medical health benefits, with plan design features, such as co-payment levels and limitations on the number of treatments covered, be substantially the same for mental health care and medical care.
California’s parity act, the California Mental Health Parity Act of 1999, requires plans to provide equal coverage for medical health and severe mental health conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, panic attacks, obsessive-compulsive disorder, autism, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and serious emotional problems in children.
California Blue Shield says it should not have to cover the stay in the residential facility because Harlick’s policy excluded coverage for residential care for all types of illnesses, and because the facility was not licensed.