Letting an insurer selling health coverage approved in one state sell the same coverage in other states might be an especially efficient way to expand the number of people with coverage.
Douglas Elmendorf, director of the Congressional Budget Office, presented that conclusion today at a hearing of the Senate Budget Committee.
Analysts at the Congressional Budget Office compared the cross-state sales approach with several other proposals, such as a proposal that would require health insurers to charge all individuals in the same community the same rates, regardless of the individuals’ health status.
The analysts also looked at the idea of requiring all states to establish pools that would insure the health of “high-risk” individuals, and then having the federal government subsidize enrollees’ premiums.
What Your Peers Are Reading
Simply letting health insurers sell health coverage across state lines could increase the number of people with health coverage about 400,000 by 2014, Elmendorf testified, according to a written version of his remarks.
About 100,000 individuals would drop coverage due to higher costs, and 100,000 employees and dependents would lose coverage when their employers dropped coverage, Elmendorf said.
But roughly 600,000 individuals with relatively low expected health costs would gain coverage, CBO analysts estimate.
The federal government likely would gain about $7.6 billion revenue: the government might spend about $400 million more on Medicaid, but it could collect $8 billion in additional tax revenue over 10 years, as employers converted some tax-exempt health expenditures into taxable wages.
CBO analysts predict that imposing a “community rating” pricing requirement on small group coverage in all states probably would reduce the total number of U.S. residents with health coverage about 400,000 by 2014. But shifting to a nationwide community rating approach might increase tax revenue by about $5 billion over 10 years, CBO analysts estimate.