Podcast Center
Video Center
Webcasts
Resource Center
Events
September 01, 2006 at 04:00 AM
A more hands-on approach to investments is being taken by registered investment advisors, including the use of alternative products, according to a survey by an affiliate of Rydex Investments.
The poll of 630 RIAs, conducted online between February and May 2006, found that 38% employed tactical investment techniques in 2005, up from 17% in 2003. Nearly three quarters (74%) invest in exchange-traded funds, vs. 42% the previous year.
The changes suggest advisors are more actively managing portfolios in response to challenging markets. By contrast, the percentage of advisors who consider themselves as merely setting overall investing strategy, as opposed to active portfolio management, has declined from 68% in 2003 to 38% in 2005.
RIA businesses are doing well overall, with average assets under management per firm at a seven-year high of $127 million, an 18% increase over 2004 levels, the survey indicated. Profits were up 30% and revenues up 22% in 2005, but asset management fees declined as a share of total revenue. (More on the survey can be found in PracticeEdge, the Investment Advisor monthly e-newsletter, written by AdvisorBenchmarking and available at www.investmentadvisor.com)
SEC Backs Down on Appeal
Meanwhile, SEC Chairman Chris-topher Cox said August 7 that the Commission would let stand an appeals court ruling in June that struck down the SEC’s rule requiring hedge fund managers to register with the Commission as investment advisors. Instead, Cox said the SEC would soon issue new rules designed to address the shortcomings in the previous hedge fund registration rule. A new anti-fraud rule would effectively “look through” a hedge fund to its underlying investors, rather than its clients, a change in terminology designed to circumvent the court’s finding in Goldstein v. SEC that the hedge fund rule didn’t adequately explain how investors were “clients” of hedge funds.
“This would reverse the side-effect of the Goldstein decision that the anti-fraud provisions of the Act apply only to ‘clients’ as the court interpreted that term, and not to investors in the hedge fund,” Cox said in a prepared statement.
