Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor

Life Health > Health Insurance

Self-Insurance Bill Opposed By Insurers

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

NU Online News Service, Feb. 12, 1:15 p.m. – Health insurers and business groups are clashing again over legislation that would allow trade associations to organize self-insured health insurance groups.

Legislation strongly backed by the Bush administration, creating association health plans (AHPs), was introduced in the House yesterday with strong bipartisan support.

Similar legislation backed by the administration was introduced in the 107th Congress but was not enacted.

At a press briefing, Labor Secretary Elaine L. Chao said the legislation “is aimed squarely at the gap in coverage among small businesses, the bedrock of our economy, and job creation.”

Called the Small Business Health Fairness Act, the legislation would allow trade and professional associations to establish self-insured groups on behalf of their members.

The groups would be exempt from state insurance regulation but would have to meet federally mandated solvency requirements. These include a mandatory indemnified back-up plan to assure claims are paid, independent actuarial certification of solvency on a quarterly basis and mandatory surplus reserves of $2 million.

The National Association of Manufacturers, Washington, praised the legislation, which at press time did not yet have a number, as crucial to small businesses that want to provide health insurance.

The legislation would allow small businesses to take advantage of the same economies of scale, bargaining clout and administrative efficiencies enjoyed by large employers and unions, says Neil Trautwein, NAM’s health care lobbyist.

But Donald Young, president of the Health Insurance Association of America, Washington, says the legislation would create an “unlevel playing field,” creating one set of rules for employers who can join an AHP and a different set for those who can’t.

Moreover, he says, the proposal could lead to adverse selection.

“The preferential treatment of AHPs with respect to state mandated benefits and rating restrictions will almost certainly result in a migration of small employers, particularly healthier groups, out of the general small group market into AHPs,” Young says.

Premium rates will likely rise for the employers left behind, forcing them to drop coverage and destabilizing the entire small group market, he says. He adds that if enacted, the legislation would increase the risk of fraud in the marketplace and could create the need for an expensive new federal regulatory structure that duplicates the one already in place in the states.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.