Close Close
Sign In
Newsletters
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
Podcast Center Video Center Webcasts Resource Center Events
About ThinkAdvisor Contact Us Advertise With Us Asset & Logo Licensing Sitemap Terms of Service Privacy Policy Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
ThinkAdvisor
The SEC building. Credit: Diego M. Radzinski/ALM

Portfolio > ETFs

Van Eck to Pay SEC $1.75M Over BUZZ ETF Launch

By Melanie Waddell

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The Securities and Exchange Commission said Friday that registered investment adviser Van Eck Associates Corp. has agreed to pay a $1.75 million civil penalty to settle charges that it failed to disclose a social media influencer’s role in the launch of its new exchange-traded fund.

According to the SEC’s order, in March 2021, Van Eck Associates launched the VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) to track an index based on “positive insights” from social media and other data.

“The provider of that index informed Van Eck Associates that it planned to retain a well-known and controversial social media influencer to promote the index in connection with the launch of the ETF,” the order states.

To incentivize the influencer’s marketing and promotion efforts, according to the SEC, “the proposed licensing fee structure included a sliding scale linked to the size of the fund so, as the fund grew, the index provider would receive a greater percentage of the management fee the fund paid to Van Eck Associates.”

However, as the SEC’s order finds, “Van Eck Associates failed to disclose the influencer’s planned involvement and the sliding scale fee structure to the ETF’s board in connection with its approval of the fund launch and of the management fee.”

Andrew Dean, Co-Chief of the Enforcement Division’s Asset Management Unit, said Friday that “fund boards rely on advisers to provide accurate disclosures, especially when involving issues that can impact the advisory contract, known as the 15(c) process. Van Eck Associates’ disclosure failures concerning this high-profile fund launch limited the board’s ability to consider the economic impact of the licensing arrangement and the involvement of a prominent social media influencer as it evaluated Van Eck Associates’ advisory contract for the fund.”

Van Eck Associates consented to the entry of the SEC’s order finding that it violated the Investment Company Act and Investment Advisers Act.

Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, Van Eck Associates agreed to a cease-and-desist order and a censure in addition to the monetary penalty.

Melanie Waddell

@Think_MelanieW

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.