Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor

Regulation and Compliance > Litigation

Judge Throws Out RIA’s Poaching Suit Against Cambridge

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

A Virginia federal judge on Monday dismissed a complaint that a registered investment advisor filed against broker-dealer Cambridge Investment Research, according to court documents.

Midlothian, Virginia-based RIA Colonial River Wealth Advisors sued Cambridge in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Richmond, on Nov. 10, 2022, alleging the BD assisted advisor Jayne W. Di Vincenzo, also named as a defendant in the suit, in poaching her clients back from Colonial River after she sold the business.

The plaintiff had sought at least $8 million in damages, alleging Cambridge was guilty of tortious interference with contract and tortious interference with business expectancy. The RIA argued that Cambridge and Di Vincenzo were guilty of business conspiracy and common-law civil conspiracy, and that Di Vincenzo was guilty of breach of contract.

But U.S. District Judge Roderick C. Young, on Monday, granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the claims against them “for lack of subject matter jurisdiction” and compelled the parties to arbitrate, “because the dispute is subject to a binding arbitration clause,” he said in a memorandum opinion.

A three-person arbitration panel, on March 3, 2022, ruled in favor of Di Vincenzo, according to an award posted at the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s website.

The panel granted nearly every relief claim requested by Di Vincenzo and denied in its entirety the counterclaim of Devin Garofalo, who had bought Di Vincenzo’s business. The panel awarded $591,238 in compensatory damages “for Garofalo’s default” of the asset purchase agreement, $957,400 in compensatory damages “for Garofalo’s failure to remit commissions” to Di Vincenzo, and $490,639 in attorney’s fees.

Cambridge and attorneys for the defendants and plaintiff didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on Friday about the judge’s decision.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.