Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
The California State Capitol in Sacramento, California. (Photo: Sundry Photography/Adobe Stock)

Life Health > Long-Term Care Planning

California to Reality-Check $144K Public Long-Term Care Benefits Package

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

California policymakers have paid a consulting firm to tell it how much setting up an attractive public long-term care benefits program might cost.

The California Long Term Care Insurance Task Force has developed a list of five possible LTC benefits programs, and it has hired Oliver Wyman to study each proposal’s finances.

The state would use a payroll tax to pay for a new LTC benefits program.

The task force expects Oliver Wyman to report back by Jan. 1, 2024. California lawmakers would then decide whether to implement an LTC program.

What It Means

States continue to worry about the LTC cost freight train heading toward your aging clients.

Policymakers have noticed the startup problems at the Washington state public LTC benefits program, but some still hope that states can find a way to help.

The Task Force

The California Department of Insurance formed the LTC task force to implement Assembly Bill 567.

One member of the 14-member board is Jamala Arland, an actuary at Genworth Financial, and another is Parag Shah, an actuary at Pacific Life.

The Recommendations

The leanest of the five programs on the task force options list would pay up to $36,000 over two years, as soon as people need care, for eligible program participants who are living at home. It would cover support services, such as adult daycare services and meal delivery, but not housing or facility-based care costs. Claimants could use the benefits anywhere in the United States.

The richest option would pay up to $144,000 over two years, as soon as people need care, for either home-based or facility-based care. A program participant could share the benefits pool with a spouse or domestic partner, and claimants could use the program to pay for care anywhere in the world.

The task force had its members as well as members of the general public rate the options.

The leanest option was unpopular with both the task force members and the general public.

The richest option was the favorite of all members of the general public, and it also had the highest level of support from the task force members.

The California State Capitol in Sacramento, California. (Photo: Sundry Photography/Adobe Stock)


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.