Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
An accountant using a calculator

Life Health > Annuities > Variable Annuities

Regulators Work to Keep Hot Annuity Products Fair

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • The NAIC is sticking with the ILVA name for products that many insurers are calling registered index-linked annuities.
  • Members of the ILVA Subgroup are also developing definitions for other product terms.
  • Some of the discussions involve how to word references to periods of time.

State insurance regulators are still shaping actuarial guidelines for a hot retirement savings product — the registered index-linked annuity, or RILA.

A National Association of Insurance Commissioners team is deciding what to do about RILA asset values for consumers who pull cash out early.

The goal “is to avoid designs where, when the index goes down over the interim, the contract holder is stuck with the losses, and, when the index goes up, they do not receive the upside reward,” according to a summary included in an NAIC meeting packet.

Insurers typically apply a “market value adjustment,” to reflect current index rates when consumers take cash out of an indexed product early.

Members of the NAIC panel are debating whether insurers should apply the adjustments to the term for the underlying assets or a term related to the annuity contract provisions, and whether a market-value adjustment should apply to all underlying assets or just to assets classified as fixed-rate assets.

What It Means

For your clients, the point of owning a RILA product might look simple: Buying a RILA is a way to get a product that falls between a traditional variable annuity and a non-variable indexed annuity on the risk-reward spectrum.

For insurers, the point of offering a RILA product might look simple: They can offer a product that resembles a traditional variable annuity, in many ways, but is simpler to manage and simpler and cheaper to hedge.

But, for state insurance regulators who are used to overseeing non-variable annuities on their own and sharing jurisdiction over variable annuities with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the new annuities raise complicated questions.

ILVA Contract Basics

When a life insurer sells your client an index-linked variable annuity, it may offer the client use of a fixed-rate fund with a crediting rate tied to the performance of its own general account assets.

But the issuer will also offer the client access to one or more crediting rate strategies tied to the performance of investment indexes or exchange-traded funds.

The issuer of a non-variable indexed annuity — often called a fixed indexed annuity — agrees to protect the client against investment-market-related loss of principal. Because the issuer is protecting the holder against investment losses, it can register the product solely with state insurance regulators and avoid having to register the product with the SEC.

The issuer of an index-linked variable indexed annuity registers the product with the SEC. Because the product is subject to SEC rules and oversight, the issuer can expose the holder to the risk of investment-market-related loss of principal.

The issuer of an ILVA contract can offer the client protection against some, all or no market risk, either through the basic contract or through a rider.

The issuer can also use derivatives contracts to protect itself against investment market fluctuations.

That means the issuer of an ILVA contract has two ways to manage market risk: the contract provisions that determine how much market risk it has agreed to assume, and the derivatives contracts.

Mincing Words

In the early 2000s, the SEC fought to get jurisdiction over non-variable indexed annuity products, which were once known as “equity indexed annuities.”

Most life insurers now call those products “fixed indexed annuities,” to reflect the fact that Congress agreed to let issuers keep filing those products as non-variable, state-regulated products, and not as products subject to SEC oversight.

In 2010, some insurers began trying to set themselves apart by developing ILVA products, which offered most of the same features as non-variable indexed annuity contracts but gave them a chance to adjust just how much market risk they were assuming.

The issuers of the early variable index-linked products started out using names such as “structured annuities,” or “buffered annuities,” to reflect the fact that most of those early products provided a specified amount of protection, or partial buffer, against loss of principal, rather than full protection of principal.

Prolonged low interest rates have increased issuer and regulator interest in the ILVA market in the past few years.

Today, most insurers and LIMRA, an industry research group, are now calling the variable index-linked products registered index-linked annuities.

The NAIC team looking at actuarial rules for the products has decided to call itself the Index-Linked Variable Annuity Subgroup, rather than the Registered Index-Linked Annuity Subgroup.

Other NAIC panels have started shifting to the use of the term ILVA, to reflect the ILVA Subgroup’s work.

The Guidelines

The NAIC’s Index-Linked Variable Annuity Subgroup began posting ILVA actuarial guidelines drafts in November 2021 and seeking comments on the drafts.

The subgroup held an online meeting to discuss their work July 13.

Members of the subgroup’s parent, the Life Actuarial Task Force, reviewed the subgroup’s work earlier this week, at the NAIC’s summer meeting in Portland, Oregon.

The list of entities participating in guideline discussions includes the American Council of Life Insurers, the Insured Retirement Institute, Ameriprise, CUNA Mutual, the American Academy of Actuaries and state insurance regulators.

Insurers and insurance groups have been working to help insurers understand how the ILVA products on the market now really work, and how some of the guidelines language regulators have suggested could limit or eliminate current product features.

Regulators are trying to make sure the guidelines apply to all of the annuities that they want to classify as ILVAs, but not to other types of annuities.

Regulators have put one principle in a current guideline project summary that relates to early cash withdrawals. The principle states that the interim values used for the market-value adjustments applied to the early withdrawals should be defined in the annuity contract to “provide equity between the contract holder and the insurance company.”

Another principle is that the interim values should be “consistent with the value of the hypothetical portfolio over the index strategy term.”

The term “hypothetical portfolio” refers to the assets supporting the index strategy, according to the project summary.

Participants in the discussion about the drafts are still talking about some basic product terms, and whether the terms should be defined in the contracts or simply reflect the language in state insurance laws and regulations.

Steve Wolfrath, for example, has commented on regulators’ use of the word “term” in rules related to interim asset valuations, according to a draft summary of a July 13 online ILVA Subgroup meeting that was included in the new meeting packet.

Wolfrath, an Ameriprise annuity product developer, said the subgroup should consider letting the insurer choose whether to base calculations on the duration of the underlying assets or a duration related to the product features.

(Photo: Shutterstock)


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.