Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
headshot of IRA expert Ed Slott

Retirement Planning > Spending in Retirement > Required Minimum Distributions

Ed Slott: IRS’ Secure Act RMD Regs Are Effective Now; Here’s How to Proceed

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • The changes to the 10-year rule for inherited IRAs is already effective, the IRA expert and CPA says.
  • He expects the IRS to issue relief guidance.
  • Clients with inherited IRAs should not take RMDs for years 1-9, or make up missed 2021 RMDs until IRS issues guidance, he says.

The IRS’ recently released proposed regulations on how to handle required minimum distributions under the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (Secure) Act of 2019 are effective now.

While the IRS’ recently released regs “are called ‘proposed’ regulations, they are not like proposed tax laws which are not effective until signed into law,” Ed Slott of Ed Slott & Co. told ThinkAdvisor in a recent email.

For instance, “the changes to the 10-year rule for inherited IRAs, specifically the RMD requirement for years 1 to 9 when death is after the required beginning date is based on IRS’ interpretation of existing law, and is technically already effective,” Slott said.

Industry groups, Slott pointed out, “are complaining about this since some beneficiaries have already missed RMDs for 2021 they didn’t know they had to take!”

The “RMD rule (RMDs for years 1-9) was already established law under the existing regulations,” Slott continued.

In the IRS’ new regs, however, Slott explained, the “IRS is saying that the years 1-9 RMDs (when death occurs on or after the required beginning date) are still applicable in addition to the 10-year rule. In other words, when death is on or after the RMD, then both rules apply —

(1) RMDs for years 1-9, and

(2) The 10-year rule — the full balance in the inherited IRA must be withdrawn by the end of the 10th year after death — i.e., by the end of the 10-year term.”

Slott added: “No one saw this coming because we believed that the Secure Act 10-year rule replaced the requirement for annual (years 1-9) RMDs, but IRS says ‘no’ and that both rules apply.”

The IRS will “have to issue some relief guidance on this,” he continued, hopefully before year-end.

“I would not have clients act on this (taking the annual RMDs for years 1-9, or making up any missed 2021 RMDs) until later in the year when hopefully IRS will provide clear guidance on this unusual and uncertain situation,” Slott said.

Comments are due on the IRS’ plan by May 25, and a public hearing is scheduled for June 15. The IRS may amend the proposed regs after considering the comments.

Industry Groups Weigh In

On March 25, industry trade groups like the Insured Retirement Institute, American Benefits Council, American Council of Life Insurers, Committee of Annuity Insurers and the Investment Company Institute urged Treasury and the IRS to issue guidance and delay effective dates for certain provisions in the regs.

A letter from the groups seeks prompt guidance that extends the deadline for amending qualified plan and IRA documents to reflect the Secure Act’s changes to RMD rules and delays the effective date of the new proposed regulations on RMDs.

The Secure Act, the groups told Treasury and IRS, “made significant changes to the RMD rules for certain qualified plans and IRAs, generally starting in 2020. There has been little guidance on these changes until the proposed regulations, which are voluminous and complex. They contain many new concepts and present administrative challenges, which will take individuals, their advisers, and the organizations that administer retirement benefits substantial time to understand and address.”

The final regulations also “could make further changes, which could require financial institutions to undo or modify steps they took (or attempted) to implement the proposed regulations,” the groups wrote.

Pictured: Ed Slott (Photo: Natalie Brasington)


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.