Portfolio > Alternative Investments > Real Estate

Australia Fires Put Insurers' Real Estate Investments in a Glowing Light

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The wave of bushfires now roaring over much of Australia has raised a sensitive question: Are the fires relevant enough to people interested in the U.S. life insurance and annuity markets that those people can justify reading about the fires while at work?

(Related: Debt Funds Overtake Life Insurers In Commercial Mortgage Lending)

The answer appears to be that the bushfires in Australia will have little effect on U.S. life insurers’ real estate, mortgage or mortgage-backed securities’ portfolios, but that concerns about the fires might affect how U.S. life insurers see their investments in real estate-related assets in the United States.

Australia Basics

Australia has 26 million residents living in an area of 3 million square miles.

Fires began burning there months ago. The fires getting the most attention in Australia now, which are in the Australian states of Victoria and New South Wales, are affecting about 14 million.

The number of people affected by the fires in Australia is similar to the size of the population of Pennsylvania.

Two years ago, when a wave of wildfires was burning through California, those fires were affecting about 11 million people.

Australia has residential real estate with a total value of about $5 trillion, in U.S. currency, and commercial real estate with a total value of about $600 billion.

Australia’s Insurance Council of Australia has received reports of only about $200 million in bushfire-related property insurance claims as of Dec. 20, but the fires appear to have expanded, and come closer to the edges of big cities, such as Melbourne and Sydney since then.

Today, for example, Twitter is full of notices from Australia’s fire safety authorities. The authorities are telling many people that their communities are surrounded by fire, and that there’s no way for the people living in those communities to evacuate. Those people are being advised to try to find shelter on the beach, or in a lake. People on Twitter are posting many accounts of hearing of firefighters who have run out of water and have had to give up on trying to save homes.

U.S. Life Insurers’ Investments

U.S. life insurers ended 2018 with about $4.2 trillion in assets, $523 billion in investments in mortgages, and about $20 billion in investments in real estate, according to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ Capital Markets Bureau.

U.S. life insurers ended 2015 with only about $16 billion in exposure to mortgages and real estate investments outside the United States. Investments in Australian mortgages and real estate accounted for less than 5% of the $16 billion, or less than $800 million, according to the NAIC.

U.S. life insurers ended  2015 with about $47 billion in bonds from Australia, including $8.9 billion in bonds issued by Australian financial services companies.

Genworth Financial Inc. has a major mortgage insurance operation in Australia. but typical mortgage insurance policies sold in Australia appear to exclude coverage for losses caused by physical damage to the insured homes. The mortgage borrowers are supposed by transfer natural disaster risk to property and casualty insurers, by buying homeowners’ insurance.

Climate Change Concerns

Although the bushfires in Australia are unlikely to have a noticeable direct effect on U.S. life insurers investment portfolios, they may intensify conversations among life insurers and other real estate investors about how they ought to respond to the 2017 wave of fires in California.

The conversations are in their early stages.

A climate change publication,, and GeoPhy, released a report about a year ago that focused on describing and applying strategies for estimating how vulnerable some of the big real estate investment trust companies are to climate change. But the authors of that publication focused mainly on vulnerability to hurricane and seal level increase risk, not to wildfire risk.

Deloitte included an extensive discussion of a need for “climate change disclosures” in its 2018 report on Australia’s mortgage market.

Sharanjit Paddam, a financial services actuary, suggested in an essay included in the report that an increase in average temperatures could exacerbate problems with bushfires,

The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures has encouraged companies to assess their own potential exposure to climate-related problems and to disclose that exposure. Like the team, the task force appears to be focusing mainly on windstorm and flooding risk, and mentioning wildfire risk only in passing.

Ceres — a nonprofit that promotes sustainable investing — published a report by Max Messervy in 2016 that went into detail about the effects rising sea levels could have on life insurers’ investment portfolios. Messervy mentioned P&C insurers’ exposure to wildfires a few times, but he mentioned life insurers’ exposure to wildfire risk only briefly, in connection with John Hancock’s investments in forests and raw land.

— Read Creating Client Events That Aren’t a Waste of Timeon ThinkAdvisor.

— Connect with ThinkAdvisor Life/Health on FacebookLinkedIn and Twitter.