Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Portfolio > Economy & Markets > Fixed Income

How to Avoid Greenwashing

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

“Greenwashing” — or making misleading claims about the environmental benefits of a product, usually bonds — has garnered much attention of late, but managers IA spoke to say it can be avoided by doing the necessary homework.

Steve Liberatore, portfolio manager of TIAA Investments’ multibillion-dollar fixed income team, notes that the firm has been in SRI for decades.

“We’ve been buying green bonds before they were labeled as ‘green bonds,’” Liberatore says.

He adds that his group “doesn’t care if a security is labeled a ‘green bond,’ we focus on the underlying use of the security. We get impact metrics.” And they dig down to see how the environment is benefiting from these bonds.

“The concept of greenwashing is negative, not only for issuers but for investors,” he says, adding that “green” is not an SEC-trigger word, so anyone could issue a so-called green bond without really being one.

Therefore, bonds bought by TIAA don’t need to be green bonds, per se. He notes that with the nature of fixed income, the firm has the ability to control how assets are utilized and what outcomes are derived. Its size also allows TIAA to have input into the issuer product.

“It’s a unique characteristic of the fixed income market,” Liberatore says.

“Firms need to focus on how dollars are being used,” he says, adding investments must have a disciplined approach to reporting. “We’ve looked at plenty of transactions but when we were unable to get the impact reporting,” they walked away.

Catherine Banat, RBC Global Asset Management’s director of U.S. responsible investing, says there’s two ways to looking at impact investing: There’s a “value” component as well as a “values” aspect, and they are easy to confuse in the marketplace.

Value entails, for example, looking at a tobacco company and determining if there is “contingent liability,” that is, the danger the company could be sued. “You may decide that incremental risk or that event risk is too uncertain to evaluate value,” she says. “That’s the value discussion.”

However, a values component would be a cancer-oriented foundation not wanting to invest in tobacco companies because it “is not consistent with their mission,” Banat says.

Her group digs into the prospectus on a loan level. “We build fixed income portfolios evaluating each loan,” she explains. She adds that “some prospectuses are clearly earmarked for green projects, but sometimes [they] are too vague about use of proceeds,” which her group avoids.

A Different Approach Taking a different direction is Ethan Powell, CEO of Impact Shares, which is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit exchange-traded fund platform. Powell designed his firm to work with other non-profit organizations such as the NAACP and YWCA, which give their stamps of approval on companies they believe follow their organization criteria. Impact Shares operates and distributes the funds on behalf of the social advocacy groups, Powell says.

This system makes it simpler for advisors because they can rely on investing that is aligned with various nonprofit group goals, he says.

One typical problem for advisors may be if they select, for example, Walmart for an ESG investment because it uses solar panels on every distribution center, but the investor doesn’t like the store’s labor practices, Powell explains. By leaving it to organizations like NAACP to determine if a firm lives up to its criteria — for example, if GM is working to advance minority empowerment — it provides advisors a stronger and less complicated client discussion.

“Our goal is to have a platform by which every social issue is represented by a separately investable fund,” Powell explains. “So an advisor can say, ‘Here’s a list of three dozen social advocacy groups. Do you want to align your capital with the American Heart Association for heart health, or Habitat for Humanity for affordable housing or the NAACP?’”

This system, he says, makes it less likely investors and advisors will get caught in greenwashing schemes.

Ginger Szala is executive managing editor of Investment Advisor. She can be reached at [email protected].


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.