Close Close

Regulation and Compliance > Federal Regulation > SEC

4 Apollo Advisors to Pay SEC $52M Over Failure to Disclose Fees, Conflicts

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Four private equity fund advisors affiliated with Apollo Global Management agreed Tuesday to pay $52.7 million to the Securities and Exchange Commission for misleading fund investors about fees and a loan agreement and failing to supervise a senior partner who charged personal expenses to the funds.

An SEC investigation found that the Apollo advisors failed to adequately disclose the benefits they received to the detriment of fund investors by accelerating the payment of future monitoring fees owed by the funds’ portfolio companies upon the sale or initial public offering of those companies. 

“The lump sum payments received by the Apollo advisors essentially reduced the portfolio companies’ value prior to their sale or IPO and reduced amounts available for distribution to fund investors,” the SEC states.

Apollo was in line to buy some of the assets of beleaguered RCS Capital, founded by real estate mogul Nicholas Schorsch.

The SEC also found that one of the Apollo advisors failed to disclose certain information about interest payments made on a loan between the advisor’s affiliated general partner and five funds. 

“The purpose of the loan was to defer taxes on carried interest due the general partner,” the SEC says. “The loan agreement obligated the general partner to pay interest to the funds during the course of the loan, and the funds’ financial statements disclosed that interest was accruing as an asset of the funds. But that interest was instead ultimately allocated solely to the general partner, which made the disclosures in the financial statements misleading.”

Andrew Ceresney, director of the SEC Enforcement Division, said in a statement that “a common theme in our recent enforcement actions against private equity firms is their failure to properly disclose fees and conflicts of interest to fund investors.”

Investors in Apollo funds “were not adequately informed about accelerated monitoring fees and separately allocated loan interest, and therefore were unable to gauge their impact on their investments.”

According to the SEC’s order instituting the settled administrative proceeding, Apollo’s supervisory failures pertain to a then-senior partner at the firm who was twice caught improperly charging personal items and services to Apollo-advised funds and their portfolio companies. 

“Other than verbally reprimanding the partner and requiring repayment of improperly submitted expenses, Apollo took no further remedial or disciplinary steps on either occasion,” the SEC states. “A firmwide expense review eventually revealed even more personal expenses the partner improperly charged to fund clients, and this led to the partner’s separation from the firm.”

Anthony Kelly, co-chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Asset Management Unit, added that Apollo “failed to take appropriate action to protect its clients upon first learning that a partner was improperly expensing personal items and services to the funds, and its failure resulted in repeated misconduct.”

Apollo consented to the entry of the SEC’s order finding that it violated Sections 206(2) and 206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rules 206(4)-7 and 206(4)-8. 

The order also finds that Apollo failed reasonably to supervise the then-partner pursuant to Section 203(e)(6) of the Advisers Act. 

Apollo agreed to cease and desist from further violations without admitting or denying the findings, and must pay $37.527 million in disgorgement, $2,727,552 in interest, and a $12.5 million penalty. Apollo agreed to distribute the disgorgement and interest amounts to affected fund investors.  

Apollo said in a statement that the “full amount” of the SEC settlement “was already reserved and disclosed in prior Apollo’s K and Q,” and that the ongoing SEC investigation “relates to an employee,” not Apollo Global Management.

More than “95% of the settlement relates to acceleration of monitoring fees, with a very small amount (under $2 million) on allocation of interest on loan and no monetary figure associated with the employee expense issue,” Apollo said.


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.