WASHINGTON — The government today renewed its call for prompt oral arguments in the case involving its designation of MetLife as a systemically important financial institution (SIFI), hopefully in October or “as soon thereafter as is feasible.”
See also: MetLife defends its SIFI challenge
The March 30 decision by Judge Rosemary Collyer declaring MetLife’s designation as arbitrary and capricious “nullifies an important action that the nation’s financial regulators collectively took in response to a potential threat to U.S. financial stability,” the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) said in a memo to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. ”Prompt resolution is essential,” the brief said.
See also: Two Fed chiefs support MetLife as SIFI
The memo asked that oral arguments be scheduled for a time in the first three weeks of October. “If, however, argument cannot be scheduled in October, we ask that argument be scheduled for the earliest possible date thereafter,” the memo said.
The court has so far not designated a panel to hear the case.
The memo was filed by the Department of Justice, which is representing the U.S. in the case. The brief noted that the government’s response to MetLife’s reply brief is due Sept. 9th, and that the court issued an order for expedited handling of the case, and the order directed the clerk “to calendar this case for argument on an appropriate date following the completion of briefing.”
The government’s memo said it was seeking early arguments in the case based on a letter from MetLife’s chief counsel, Eugene Scalia, indicating that the trial on his calendar that took precedence for him had been moved from early October to Nov. 3, and that, therefore, he would be available for oral arguments in the MetLife case in October.
Ryan Schoen, a securities analyst with Washington Analysis, said that in most cases, the D.C. Circuit schedules oral arguments for between two and four months after the final briefing deadline.
However, it appears the government is confident in its case, and would like the case to be heard as soon as possible. And, Schoen added, “nothing appears to stop an October oral argument in the case.”
The FSOC brief said that agency as “consulted with MetLife’s counsel regarding this motion. MetLife has indicated that it intends to file a statement in response.”
An industry lawyer who asked not to be named interpreted this part of the letter as asking the court to schedule oral arguments before Scalia’s scheduled trial appearance in November, that is, sometime in October.