Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor

Financial Planning > Behavioral Finance

Using Monte Carlo Distributions in Financial Planning

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) wasn’t always a common financial planning software tool. When it was included in the past, it was often limited to one or two variables. Today, even if the software applies MCS to a few more assumptions, it’s usually locked down which prevents the user from modifying existing parameters or applying MCS to other variables in the plan. This can be a major flaw, but if the output looks sleek, it is a flaw which receives very little discussion. In this post, we’ll discuss the use of MCS distributions in financial planning applications. 

Monte Carlo simulation may or may not be the ultimate or optimal solution to financial forecasting. However, it is the best option I know about and is certainly more advantageous than deterministic or linear analysis. What makes MCS so beneficial is the ability to place a distribution on an uncertain input to model its variance. If this is unfamiliar territory, consider this. Assume you have an investment account with an expected return of 10% and a standard deviation of 20%. Using MCS on this assumption, the return will fluctuate by the degree of its standard deviation.

Monte Carlo simulation

For example, the mean or average return is 10%, as indicated by the vertical line in the center of the distribution. The lines to the right and left of the mean represent one, two and three standard deviations on each side of the average. Therefore, the expectation is that two-thirds of the returns will fall between negative 10% and positive 30% (i.e., one standard deviation). Two standard deviations would include 95% of the expected returns (negative 30% to positive 50%). Three standard deviations encompass 99% of the expected results. One question should emerge immediately. Is this the best distribution to use? If not, is there a better distribution and how do you determine it? 

When a client engages an advisor to create a financial plan, the planner needs the flexibility to select the best type of distribution for each assumption. There are several additional MCS distributions which can be used in a financial plan, including Triangular, Uniform, Lognormal, Beta, BetaPERT and Gamma. 

Next week we’ll discuss distribution selection in financial planning and the situations where they might apply.

Until then, thanks for reading and have a nice week!

See Mike Patton’s previous blog on this topic, Using Monte Carlo in Financial Planning: The Assumptions


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.