Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Life Health > Annuities > Variable Annuities

Investment-only VAs vs. guaranteed VAs

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

While most Americans are seeking guaranteed retirement income, a new white paper says that unguaranteed investment-only variable annuities can sometimes top guaranteed VAs in wealth accumulation for either retirement or legacy potential.

The white paper, “A New Approach to Retirement Income: Next Gen vs. Traditional VAs,” from Jefferson Financial and Wade Pfau, Ph.D., retirement income professor at the American College of Financial Services, pointed out that compounding fees can drag down the money accumulated in a guaranteed VA over time, leaving less available than one with lower costs.

See also: Annuity sales at 3-year high

Citing the primary advantage to the variable annuity structure as the power of tax deferral, the white paper said that studies have shown its effects — boosting performance potential by 100–200 basis points — without increasing risk. But to get the most benefit out of tax deferral, a VA must have two other things: low cost and fund choices that allow an effective management strategy.

The white paper said that the latest generation of IOVAs can provide those, and included additional findings based on more than 80 years of market data and the running of 5,000 Monte Carlo simulations to test a number of scenarios.

In a majority of scenarios, the paper said, the IOVA is likely to generate income comparable to the guaranteed VA. Also in a majority of cases, the lower cost of the IOVA lessened the risk of wealth depletion and increased the potential for additional wealth accumulation.

See also: Find the right annuity for the job

However, while the guaranteed VA would provide guaranteed income even if the balance fell to zero, its higher asset-based fees were more likely to erode the returns on the underlying assets, causing the balance to reach zero more quickly.

“Generating reliable retirement income has become more challenging for advisors as each client’s situation is unique, market dynamics have become more complex, and the landscape for variable annuities has changed,” said Mitchell Caplan, CEO of Jefferson National, in a statement.

Caplan added, “Our new whitepaper lays out the factors associated with guaranteed variable annuities and investment-only VAs, two dramatically different products, to help advisors and their clients identify the best approach to accumulate more wealth and live a fuller life in retirement.”


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.