Podcast Center
Video Center
Webcasts
Resource Center
Events
July 01, 2014 at 10:49 AM
FPA’s outspoken CEO, Bob Rodriguez, is warning that America’s fiscal fuse is nearing its end unless the U.S. electorate stages a revolt in the upcoming midterm elections.
In an address last month to shareholders of the $30 billion fund family, newly made available on the firm’s website, Rodriguez suggested that 10 Senate seats needed to swing to the GOP to shock the U.S. political system into taking action to prevent the next crisis.
However, the former manager — the only manager ever to achieve the distinction of Morningstar Manager of the Year on both the equity and fixed-income sides — considers such a tectonic shift unlikely, foreseeing instead a time when bond vigilantes stage an open revolt against U.S. fiscal impropriety.
Before updating his current warning, however, Rodriguez, who has long been a vocal critic of excessive U.S. debt, compared his own track record in making predictions with that of the Federal Reserve.
The FPA exec noted that Fed minutes from 2005 and 2006 quote former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke as saying there was no housing bubble; that in April and June 2007, Bernanke said there would be no contagion from subprime credit (“I argued differently,” Rodriguez recalls); that the Fed, in June 2009, expected real GDP growth of 4% to 5% in 2010 and 2011, far from the actual 2.8% and 2.1%.
Further, the Fed called for long-term unemployment to fall to 4.5% to 5.3% (saying nothing about a declining labor participation rate), and Bernanke wrote in fall 2010 that quantitative easing would create a wealth effect.
In contrast, in June 2009, Rodriguez forecast 2% real growth during the economic recovery, just shy of the 2.2% outcome since 2009. However, he notes that “it was [actually] 2%, until the Bureau of Economic Analysis revised its method of estimating GDP in July 2013 that created $500 billion of additional economic growth out of thin air.”
He also forecast high unemployment, aggravated by a declining labor participation rate; that QE and zero interest-rate policy would not bring robust growth; and that the 2009 stimulus plan would merely waste money and time on gimmicks such as “cash for clunkers” and a one-time $8,000 credit to buy a home.
Rodriguez says he was wrong in suggesting that pretax profit margins would not experience a robust recovery, but was on target in suggesting that Treasury debt measured at $10 trillion in the fall of 2008 would grow to between $14.6 and $16.6 trilion by the end of 2011.
“This comparison of the accuracy of my forecasts, versus the Fed’s, hopefully lends a degree of credibility to my comments and forecasts that follow,” Rodriguez told FPA investors.
As is his wont, Rodriguez’s predictions were stark. He compared QE to a narcotic whose effects wear off, requiring a new fix.
“Do I have confidence in a Fed exit strategy? No!” he exclaimed. “Why should I have confidence in an institution that could not recognize the greatest bubble in history, the housing bubble?”
Rodriguez was no less sanguine about fiscal policy makers for what he called “ad hoc governmental intrusion” that has occurred during the Great Recession. Instances he cited include “the differential treatment of Bear Stearns, AIG and Lehman Brothers,” the “arbitrary prioritization of the standing of creditors and pensioners in the GM and Chrysler reorganizations” and the government’s heavy-handed approach to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, about which he said:
“The government technically owns 79.9% of each company but says it can take 100% of the profits. Is this fair or right? I am just a bystander in this debate … I am proud of the fact that in January 2006 we concluded that both companies were insolvent and that we would not lend to them. We responded by liquidating 100% of our debenture debt holdings and placed both companies on our investment restricted list. I believe we were the only company to publically state this policy. Our prudence was not rewarded because the government eventually bailed out all creditors.”
Another current danger he cites is Dodd-Frank, which has grown from the time of its 2010 passage from 848 pages to 14,000 pages in 2013, and that with only 52% of its rulemaking requirements met.
“I recently reviewed a near two-inch thick ‘summary’ of the Volcker Rule. What a joy! Does anyone have an idea of how all this will unfold? I know I don’t,” he commented, adding, ominously, that FPA’s fixed-income team “has seen a dramatic withdrawal of bond market liquidity, as these rules have been clarified.”
