Free-market intellectual George Gilder remains an optimist despite U.S. policies he views as less enlightened than Communist China.
If think tanks fuel the public debate with their ideas and research, from where do think tanks get their intellectual energy supplies?
If you’re a conservative and free-market oriented think tank, then George Gilder is one of your key sources.
No less than Stephen Moore, the chief economist of the Heritage Foundation and a former member of the Wall Street Journal editorial board, speaking at the Altegris investment conference in San Diego, acknowledged his debt to Gilder’s influential work.
What Your Peers Are Reading
Gilder, whose bestselling classic Wealth and Poverty made him President Reagan’s most quoted living author, shared the same stage with Moore, but I had the opportunity to sit down with Gilder privately, mainly to discuss the issues just under the surface of today’s conservative intellectual debate: namely, the fact that free-market conservatism, practically speaking, appears to be “out of favor,” to put it in investment-speak.
So much discussion — at the Altegris annual conference, but at others as well — takes aim at easy money, loose fiscal policies, heavy regulation, Keynesianism and so forth, and yet that approach to governance won handy electoral victories in 2008 and 2012.
Are free-market conservatives doomed?
Gilder acknowledged that current political arrangements are less than wholesome to his camp.
“This administration is much more hostile to free enterprise than the Chinese communists,” he said.
“The Chinese have got free zones [free-market-oriented special economic zones] all over the place. The Chinese communists have 40% lower government spending as a share of GDP than the U.S,” he added, noting that even Russia’s economic trajectory is set to achieve lower spending to GDP in the coming years.
But despite this trend he decries, Gilder’s indefatigable optimism could not be suppressed.
“The economy of the mind can change as fast as markets can,” he said, noting that after World War II, everyone was predicting another economic depression. “But in 1946 a new Congress came in and achieved a 61% drop in government spending; 150,000 regulations were laid off. Tax rates were, effectively, cut in half. That set the stage for the golden age that followed.”
A walking, talking economic encyclopedia, Gilder offered further substantiation from the other side of the globe, noting that Chile similarly reformed its economy in the 1970s, cutting 500 government corporations down to 25.