Podcast Center
Video Center
Webcasts
Resource Center
Events
October 01, 2013 at 08:01 AM
Asset management firms look to be next on the Financial Stability Oversight Council’s list to be considered Systemically Important Financial Institutions (SIFIs).
At the behest of FSOC, the Office of Financial Research released a report Monday titled Asset Management and Financial Stability that provides an overview of the asset management industry and analyzes how asset management firms and the activities in which they engage can introduce vulnerabilities that could pose, amplify, or transmit threats to financial stability.
FSOC is studying the activities of asset management firms to better inform its analysis of whether — and how — to consider such firms for enhanced prudential standards and supervision under Section 113 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
Related story: SEC fiduciary rule unlikely in Dodd-Frank’s third year
The report notes that the U.S. asset management industry, which oversees the allocation of approximately $53 trillion in financial assets, “is central to the allocation of financial assets on behalf of investors. By facilitating investment for a broad cross-section of individuals and institutions, discretionary asset management plays a key role in capital formation and credit intermediation, while spreading any gains or losses across a diverse population of market participants.”
The industry, the report goes on to state, “is marked by a high degree of innovation, with new products and technologies frequently reshaping the competitive landscape and changing the way that financial services are provided.”
Marcus Stanley, policy director for Americans for Financial Reform, told ThinkAdvisor that he’s “very glad to see regulators examining the potential for systemic risk created by asset management activities.” He notes that out of the five largest asset managers listed in the report (see below) “only one is currently supervised as part of a systemically significant financial entity. It is vital for regulators to understand how their activities may contribute to broader risks and whether additional supervision or designation as a nonbank SIFI is called for.”
