Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Portfolio > Alternative Investments > Real Estate

Berthel Fisher Wins Arbitration in Real Estate Case

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Claims by three accredited investors against broker-dealer Berthel Fisher & Co. Financial Services, of Marion, Iowa, were dismissed by a FINRA arbitration panel on April 9 after five weeks of proceedings that stretched out over several months.

The claims were filed in connection with the purchase of tenancy in common (TIC) interests that investors who filed the claims alleged were valueless because they were “a massive fraudulent investment scheme managed by” the respondents in the case, which included not only Berthel Fisher but also Ameriprise Financial Services. The investors sought the rescission of their investments and return of their money.

Hearings began in August, but were interrupted and then resumed in February, concluding in March. After testimony that, according to the broker-dealer, “included hundreds of exhibits, testimony from industry experts and more than fifteen fact witnesses,” arbitrators dismissed investor claims against Berthel Fisher. Ameriprise Financial Services did not participate, as it is not a member of FINRA, and no claims were adjudicated against it, according to the arbitration award.

When asked by AdvisorOne about the investors’ claim that the TIC interests were valueless, Rick Murphy, president of Berthel Fisher, said, “We don’t believe so. The building is still there; they [the investors] still own it; it’s still fully occupied.”

While he said that the value of One Southwest Crossing, a class A office building of more than 200,000 square feet in Eden Prairie, Minn., may have gone down when the real estate market crashed, he added that the company tells its investors that it cannot control what the real estate market does.

Murphy said, “We believe, and I believe SEC and FINRA believe, that tenant in common securities are securities under the Act [the Securities Act of 1933]. But it is direct ownership of real estate.” He added that the company believed Berthel Fisher complied with requirements for due diligence regarding such securities, both as required by FINRA and under the Act, “and the arbitration panel obviously felt we had done so as well.”


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.