Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Portfolio > Investment VIPs

Knut A. Rostad, Committee for Fiduciary Standard Chair

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The Senate passed its version of the financial services reform bill, S. 3217, on Thursday, May 20, by a 59-39 vote. After the sweeping reform bill passed, Knut A. Rostad gave his opinion on the bill to Kathleen McBride, Editor in Chief of

By Knut A. Rostad

Public confidence in Congress today, by all accounts, is lower than was Richard Nixon’s public approval as he resigned from the presidency. The absence of a requirement that brokers who give investment advice be regulated like investment advisors is stupefying, but not surprising.

Investors’ (voters) historically low expectations of Congress have been met.

Many members of Congress rail against heavy-handed regulation that “picks winners and losers.” Libertarians should take note. The financial reform legislation–legislation heralded as the “Biggest regulatory overhaul of Wall Street since the depression”–essentially concludes that brokers who talk like investment advisors and work like investment advisors and persuade clients to trust them like investment advisors should not, however, be required to put clients’ interests first as the law requires of investment advisors. Brokers who act like investment advisors can continue, if they wish, to not avoid conflicts, or to not disclose and manage conflicts, to not control investment expenses, and to not, of course, tell a client how much the client is actually paying the broker in compensation.

Twenty three days after Goldman Sachs explained to the entire world, in excruciating detail, that the suitability standard means it’s fine to conceal a huge conflict of interest from a client (because the client is very smart, and understands Goldman’s role as a market maker), the Senate effectively endorsed the “Goldman standard” for institutional clients and applied it to all retail clients of brokers. This is not the world’s greatest deliberative body’s proudest moment.

Knut A. Rostad, [email protected], is regulatory and compliance officer at Rembert Pendleton Jackson, a registered investment advisor in Falls Church, Virginia, and chairman of The Committee for the Fiduciary Standard.


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.