As consumers delve deeper into the details of health care reform, many are discovering that a new government-run long term care program is part of the law. It is called the CLASS Act, which stands for Community Living Assistance Services and Supports Act, and is set to become effective Jan. 1, 2011.
When discussing this new option with consumers, it may be instructive to look back at the last major piece of legislation that affected long term care insurance — the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). HIPAA, passed in 1996, clarified the tax treatment of LTCI policies, creating a new type of plan — tax-qualified (TQ) LTCI. When that happened, many agents fell into either the TQ or the non-TQ camp. They would passionately point out the “problems” with the other camp’s TQ or non-TQ approach. As a result, consumers became confused and ultimately did not trust the advice they were getting from either side.
Similar arguments have taken place about different types of inflation coverage, cash versus reimbursement contracts, asset-based combination products versus traditional products, and multi-life individual products versus group products. Of course, there will always be legitimate differences between products, but conflicting opinions create a problem when they cause consumers to distrust the entire process.
A better approach is to let the client know that, regardless of what they’ve heard, there are really only two choices: planning for long term care expenses, or not.
If they do decide to plan, there are no “wrong” choices — only educated guesses as to the outcome of a planning method, based on past history and experience.