Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
money being hit by a gavel.

Regulation and Compliance > Litigation

Commonwealth Must Pay SEC $93M Over Revenue Sharing

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Commonwealth Financial Network lost a long battle with the Securities and Exchange Commission last week when a court ruled that the firm must pay $93 million over revenue sharing violations.

Commonwealth is liable for disgorgement of $65.6 million, interest of $21.2 million and a civil penalty of $6.5 million, according to the order issued by the U.S. District Court District of Massachusetts.

Wayne Bloom, Commonwealth’s CEO, said in a statement shared with ThinkAdvisor on Wednesday that “Commonwealth is very disappointed in the ruling, and we are exploring all options to continue to defend our position in the legal system.”

The crux of SEC’s allegations, according to the ruling, were that:

  • Commonwealth had agreements with its clearing firm, National Financial Services, to receive portions of the fees received by NFS’ No Transaction Fee and Transaction Fee programs;
  • The mutual fund shares for which Commonwealth received those fees were sometimes more expensive for clients than shares of the same funds that did not generate fees for Commonwealth;
  • The firm knew of the lower-cost alternatives to these share classes, their availability to clients, and that those lower-cost alternatives would generate less or no revenue for Commonwealth; and
  • Commonwealth failed to make robust disclosures regarding the revenue it generated from the higher-cost shares.

The ruling, issued by District Court Judge Indira Talwani on March 29, states that “Commonwealth’s failures to disclose were egregious.”

The court determined that Commonwealth “was aware that lower-cost share classes of funds in which its clients were invested were available, knew that it was generating revenue from keeping its clients in the higher cost share classes, and failed to disclose any of this to its clients. This is a fundamental violation of an investment advisers’ fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of its clients.”

The egregiousness of Commonwealth’s actions, the order continues, “is compounded by its failure to keep its Chief Compliance Officer — which it was required to appoint under the Advisers Act — adequately apprised of any conflicts of interest regarding Commonwealth’s revenue-sharing agreements with NFS.”

The SEC sued Commonwealth in 2019, alleging that from at least July 2014 through December 2018, the company breached its fiduciary duty to its advisory clients by failing to disclose conflicts of interest in a revenue-sharing program with NFS.

Specifically, Commonwealth failed to tell clients that some mutual fund share classes generated millions of dollars in revenue-sharing payments for the firm, while other, cheaper share classes would have generated much less, or no, additional revenue, the SEC contended in the complaint.

The complaint also alleged that Commonwealth failed to adopt and implement written policies and procedures reasonably designed to identify and to ensure the disclosure of material conflicts of interest arising from its revenue sharing agreement, Commonwealth noted in a report filed with the SEC in February.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.