Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore. Credit: Wyden

Financial Planning > UHNW Client Services > UHNW Client Advice

What to Know About the New Bill Targeting GRATs and ‘Abusive Trusts’

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • A new Senate bill introduced this week would modify key tax and estate planning rules dealing with grantor retained annuity trusts, or GRATs.
  • GRATs are used in estate planning to minimize income, gift or estate tax liability on appreciated assets.
  • The bill's sponsors say the ultra-wealthy abuse GRATs to avoid paying their fair share of taxes.

Senate Finance Committee Chair Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Sen. Angus King, an independent from Maine, introduced legislation this week designed to modify key tax and estate planning rules dealing with grantor retained annuity trusts, or “GRATs.”

Dubbed the “Getting Rid of Abusive Trusts Act,” the bill’s supporters say it will crack down on tax-avoidance schemes involving the abuse of “certain high-value trusts by ultra-wealthy individuals.”

Under current law, GRATs are used in the estate planning process to minimize income, gift or estate tax liability on appreciated assets — potentially resulting in as much as tens of millions of dollars in “tax savings.”

According to Sens. Wyden and King, however, GRATs are subject to a series of loopholes that results in outright tax avoidance, rather than minimization. They further argue such trusts are “neither available nor useful to middle-class Americans as a financial planning tool.”

‘Garden-Variety Tax Dodge’

Introduction of the new legislation follows on Congressional hearings held last year, during which Sen. Wyden and others examined and decried what they called “all the schemes the ultra-wealthy rely on to legally get away without paying their fair share in taxes.”

In a statement about the bill, Wyden and King repeat many of the same criticisms.

“The abuse of these high-value trusts is a clear-as-day example of how there’s a special set of tax rules that allows the ultra-wealthy to pay what they want, when they want, and oftentimes nothing at all,” Wyden said. “This is a garden-variety tax dodge in which a billionaire signs some papers and moves some money around, and suddenly they have to pay little or no tax on appreciating assets worth tens of millions of dollars.”

“Those who benefit extraordinarily from American workers, capital markets, and rule of law should support our communities at least as much as our teachers and first responders do,” King said.

What’s a GRAT?

Summarized simply, GRATs allow the grantor to freeze the value of their estate while transferring any future appreciation to the beneficiaries. Among estate planning professionals, GRATs are seen as a solid strategy for clients who want to avoid estate taxes and pass these assets to the next generation of children, grandchildren or others.

Generally, GRATs run for a fixed term and then the assets are transferred to the beneficiaries. GRATs also allow the grantor to take annuity income stream from the trust during the term of the trust, hence the name.

What’s in the Getting Rid of Abusive Trusts Act?

The bill would add various additional requirements for the creation and operation of a GRAT, all intended to impose costs on the use of GRATs so that they are less likely to be used entirely for tax avoidance purposes.

The bill adds the requirement, for example, that a GRAT must have a minimum term of 15 years and a maximum term of the life expectancy of the annuitant plus 10 years. Second, the bill prohibits any decrease in the annuity during the GRAT term, and it adds the requirement that the remainder interest in a GRAT at the time of transfer must have a minimum value for gift tax purposes.

Other key provisions dictate that any transfers of property between a trust and the deemed owner of the trust will be treated as a sale or exchange for income tax purposes. This change is intended to address prevalent tax planning methods where a taxpayer’s appreciating assets can be transferred in and out of a GRAT without incurring income tax or capital gains tax, according to Wyden and King.

Crucially, the bill further stipulates that income tax paid on the GRAT’s income is to be designated as a gift for the purposes of the gift tax — unless the owner is reimbursed from the GRAT during the same calendar year. As proposed, the gift amount cannot be reduced through the use of deductions such as the charitable deduction, marital deduction, or deductions for gifts of tuition or medical care.

This change, according to the senators, is intended to address prevalent tax planning methods where a grantor of a GRAT uses the trust to reduce the value of their estate, consequently lowering their estate tax burden while avoiding additional income or gift tax.

Pictured: Sen. Ron Wyden 


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.