Podcast Center
Video Center
Webcasts
Resource Center
Events
By 
October 20, 2023 at 10:37 AM
What You Need to Know
- PGIM conducted six separate surveys gauging financial advisors' interest in various fixed income asset classes.
- There have been significant shifts in interest since 2020, especially with respect to U.S. Treasurys.
- It’s important for advisors to stay abreast of the changing market environment to ensure that client portfolios are optimally designed.
Fixed income is a relatively broad asset class. Unlike equities, which are generally considered to be relatively risky investments, risks in fixed income can vary dramatically by asset class — consider the risks of money market funds versus high-yield bonds.
In this piece, I provide some perspective about how interest in various fixed income classes has evolved from May 2020 to May 2023 using six surveys conducted among financial advisors. I find that there have been significant shifts in interest over the period, especially with respect to U.S. Treasurys.
This information is potentially useful to financial advisors because it not only provides perspective about what types of fixed income asset classes are actively being considered but also points to fixed income sectors in which financial advisors should be familiar with the available products and strategies.
Inside the Surveys
The analysis relies on six separate surveys conducted by PGIM Investments, in May 2020, November 2020, February 2021, February 2022, February 2023 and May 2023. The surveys each consist of about 450 financial advisor respondents, with a cross section across channels and varying levels of assets under management.
A series of questions on the survey ask the advisor about how attractive the opportunity is in given fixed income sectors, which include U.S. Treasurys, mortgage-backed securities, investment-grade corporates, high-yield bonds, bank loans, Treasury Inflation Protected Securities, municipal bonds, commercial mortgage-backed securities, asset–backed securities, collateralized loan obligations, emerging market bonds in local currency, emerging market bonds in home currency and non-U.S. bonds.
There are five possible responses with respect to each asset class: Very Attractive, Moderately Attractive, Neutral, Moderately Unattractive and Very Unattractive, which I assign scores of 1.0, .5, 0, -.5, and -1.0, respectively, and create what I call the “Net Attractiveness Score.” I assign scores in an attempt to capture the differences in perspectives across classification levels.
The accompanying exhibit includes the average score for each of the asset classes included in the survey for the six periods.
