Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
Paula Hogan

Industry Spotlight > Women in Wealth

Financial Planning Industry Headed in ‘Right Direction,’ Longtime Planner Says

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The traditional brokerage model was “oddly, unrelated to the rest of the client’s life,” but “a bold change” is underway in the financial advice industry.

So says Paula Hogan, partner and private wealth manager at Creative Planning, in an interview with ThinkAdvisor.

From day one as a financial planner, Hogan — who founded Hogan Financial Management in 1992 and sold it to Creative Planning in 2019 — was ahead of the curve.

Her fee-only firm focused on comprehensive financial planning, integrating life-cycle economics with wealth life planning. Her first investing vehicle of choice: the index fund.

Assessing financial services today, Hogan, in the interview, says: “[The industry is] getting to know the client and helping people manage how they want their financial life to roll out. That’s a step in the right direction.”

Investors’ biggest concern is not portfolio performance but maintaining their standard of living, notes Hogan, whose father was a tax attorney who became interested in the concept of variable annuities and transitioned to working as an employee benefits consultant.

In our conversation, Hogan, who manages assets of just under $500 million — her assets under management were $290 million when she sold to Creative — discusses risk management, including the importance of insurance.

She had little experience in financial services when she launched her firm except for a brief stint in banking. Motivating her to go solo was an uncommon vision, not sales-driven but focused on life-cycle investing and index funds.

ThinkAdvisor recently interviewed Hogan, who was speaking by phone from her Milwaukee base.

At Creative, she is concentrating on investment strategy.

The advisor seems to have made an adjustment in advance from being a sole proprietor to employee of one of the nation’s biggest RIAs — one that The New York Times said in 2017 was “at the vanguard of a profound shift in finance.”

“As the founder [of my firm], I had to give up the ownership responsibility. I did a lot of work in my head to make sure I was ready … to be a good team player somewhere else,” she says.

Here are highlights of our interview:

THINKADVISOR: When I interviewed you for Research Magazine in 2012, you proposed a new definition of financial planning and hoped that the industry would “migrate there.”

It was: “The lifetime process of integrating personal values with the management of both human and financial capital for the betterment of self and community.”

Are we there yet?

PAULA HOGAN: I see some progress. The financial services industry comes out of the brokerage world, which historically, has been all about the portfolio and performance and, oddly, unrelated to the rest of the client’s life.

As the industry works its way out of that, it’s beginning to think about a person’s whole situation, which has to do with their values and goals, and not only their financial capital but their human capital.

That’s very different from the brokerage model of “What’s your risk tolerance — here we go! Here’s one of our standard portfolios.”

So it’s a bold change and a big advance from the traditional brokerage model to something that’s looking at all aspects of someone’s financial life through the lens of their values.

Do you still think that life-cycle investing integrated with wealth life planning is the future of financial planning, which was the vision you had in 2012?

We’re moving in that direction. Creative Planning [and other top firms] are doing it by spending time to get to know the client and having a whole suite of services that helps people manage how they want their financial life to roll out.

The industry has changed. Is your approach to planning still so different from what most planners are doing?

The firms that I find exciting are moving in [the abovementioned] direction.

Financial planning is much more than the portfolio. It’s building out what people [need] in all areas: estate planning, insurance — life and disability, property and liability — helping business owners with figuring out their business or selling it.

What mainly brought about the shift away from the broker model?

It was a natural progression, with advisors starting to listen to what people care about, what their needs are and what they need to meet those goals.

Here’s an example: When I started in financial planning in the 1990s, if a client asked about taxes, we were totally comfortable saying, “Ask your accountant; I’m your financial planner.”

But now we have sophisticated knowledge about taxes because there isn’t anything in a client’s financial life that we wouldn’t also look at through the lens of tax planning.

This is what I mean by “a natural progression.”

How do advisors help clients maintain their standard of living — the issue they’re most concerned about?

By understanding what their values are, what they care about. That determines how much risk you want to take in the portfolio and with insurance and how you handle your human capital.

Please talk more about the importance of risk management.

I don’t know that you can tell someone, “Here’s a good portfolio for you,” if you don’t know whether, say, they have disability insurance, or life insurance if they have financial dependents.

When you’re doing true comprehensive planning, you’re addressing risk issues before you jump into the portfolio because you have to know who the person is: What’s going for them? Where do they have risks? What’s their preference for how much you protect against that risk?

What else is critical to understand about the use of insurance?

It something pops up that gets you off track, insurance will go from being an expense to a source of funds.

Insurance has always been important, but even in the fee-only community, in which I was very big, there was a distaste for it and, I would argue, not enough knowledge about it.

But now, it’s just like [in the case of] tax planning. How can you talk about a client’s portfolio if you haven’t already protected the places where they have risk that need to be covered by insurance?

It would be nonsensical not to think of [doing] that. But our industry is [finally] evolving toward it.

Before you sold your practice, you worked with immediate annuities, but you no longer use annuities at all. (Creative doesn’t offer them.) Are there solutions that afford clients similar benefits?

You can use the more traditional ways of staying on a smooth course with reserves, appropriate debt, insurance, and proper tax and estate planning.

What prompted you to start your own firm 31 years ago? You had little experience as a financial planner.

I had a bee in my bonnet and a vison of what I wanted to do. We opened with index funds, and that was very unusual.

I wanted to be on what I felt was the right side of where the industry was going — and I wanted to see if I could make it work.

We did a lot of life-cycle investing. There was a moment where you could actually implement life-cycle investing in a purely academic way, but that moment has passed.

In the meantime, I believe the industry is moving toward [the life-cycle approach], and Creative is doing it.

Why did you choose Creative Planning to acquire your practice?

Once I knew I was ready to move on because of changes in my life and in the industry, I hired an investment banker. We looked at a wide range of firms and narrowed it down to probably 20 that we did some phone interviews with.

Then I personally visited with more than a dozen and talked to senior management and middle management, and walked through the back [office]; sometimes we had further interviews.

At that point, I felt I had a really good sense of the state of the industry and that Creative was the obvious place where we would find our home.

How did your business model or the way you ran your practice change after you became part of Creative?

It didn’t change very much. The first thing was that as founder, I had to give up the ownership responsibility. I did a lot of work in my head to make sure I was ready to do that — to be a good team player somewhere else.

I wasn’t sure how long I would stay with Creative because I’d never been an employee except for less than a year at banks [including the Bank of Boston, on the investment side].

I thought I could commit to Creative to 2020. But here it is 2023, and I’m still having a great time!

Pictured: Paula Hogan


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.