Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
Miniature wooden houses

Retirement Planning > Saving for Retirement

A Hidden Source of Wealth Many Retirees Overlook

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • About 60% of migrating retirees in recent years have derived substantial financial benefits from relocation, according to a new Vanguard paper.
  • The typical retiree who moves to a cheaper housing market can extract about $100,000 of home equity, while “lottery winners” can access nearly four times that amount.
  • The authors say their results challenge the narrative that housing wealth is off-limits for most retirees.

One in four U.S. retirees could derive substantial financial benefit from relocating to a more affordable housing market during the coming decade, according to a new analysis published by Vanguard.

Vanguard’s new in-depth research suggests generations of previous retirees have tapped into housing wealth as an important source of retirement funding via the “underappreciated channel” of relocation to a cheaper housing market. However, given long-term dynamics in the U.S. housing market, this strategy may be more relevant than ever.

In fact, Vanguard finds that about 60% of migrating retirees in recent years have derived substantial financial benefits from relocation, typically extracting about $100,000 of home equity.

Winning the Housing Lottery

Vanguard’s analysis highlights two types of relocations. First are those of retirees moving from a booming housing market to a more affordable market, a group Vanguard likens to “lottery winners.” Second are those who move to a low-growth housing market, or “bargain hunters.”

As the analysis shows, relocation lottery winners show up more prominently near the peaks of housing cycles, whereas bargain hunters appear mostly during the troughs. In both cases, retirees can achieve a substantial wealth windfall.

In fact, the research suggests that unlocking home equity by relocating to a less expensive housing market can provide a pivotal source of retirement funding, potentially enough to make or break a retiring couple’s nest egg.

Retirees who successfully take advantage of this strategy also often experience a substantial drop in their cost of living, Vanguard finds, allowing any windfall to go even further in retirement.

Running the Numbers

To demonstrate the potential power of the strategy, the Vanguard analysis points to a theoretical retired homeowner who purchased their primary residence for $170,000 in Boston, assuming the purchase was made in the early 1990s while the person was in their 30s.

This home would have enjoyed substantial appreciation that is significantly above the national average. According to the report, a current valuation in the realm of $500,000 would be reasonable.

If this person chose to start their retirement in Florida in their 60s in the early 2020s, they could unlock as much as $200,000 in long-term capital gains that could be directly added to the retirement nest egg, Vanguard says.

In 2019, the median homeowner age 60 or older using this technique could have accessed approximately $99,000 in home equity. The figure rises to an impressive $347,000 at the top 10th percentile.

“Since the average homeowner in that age group holds $223,000 of retirement savings in financial accounts, the additional funding could be mission-critical to a secure retirement,” the report suggests.

Housing Market Dynamics Play a Key Role

According to Vanguard, the tendency to move to a less expensive housing market varies along two important cycles. On the one hand, the tendency shows a “hump-shaped” pattern over a given investor’s lifecycle, meaning the tendency to move to a cheaper market rises in one’s 30s to 50s and peaks in the 60s. It then declines rapidly from the 70s into the 80s.

On the other hand, the composition of those using the strategy changes with the housing cycle. In a bull market, up to 50% of retire-and-relocate individuals move from a housing market with significantly above-average growth — i.e., the lottery winners — as in the case of the Boston homeowner.

During housing market downturns, however, lottery winners’ representation among those retirees who are relocating drops dramatically, toward 20%. The void is filled by the bargain hunters who access equity by moving to a housing market with weaker historic growth.

In the end, for all homeowners, the outcome of retiring and relocating is subject to the timing of the move relative to the national housing market cycle and the difference in housing market growth between the origin and the destination.

An Evolving Housing Market

The research goes on to analyze the evolution of several dozen major local housing markets from 1980 to the present. For much of that time, according to Vanguard, housing markets dynamics across the country had predominantly local drivers, resulting in significant dispersion in appreciation.

“Since the 2008-2009 financial crisis, however, most local housing markets have become highly synchronized and moved in lockstep with the national housing market, enjoying a secular upward trend,” the report points out. “Dispersion has been dramatically compressed, creating a friendly environment for retiring and relocating.”

Should the broad-based housing market momentum reverse, however, this new nationalized situation implies that retirees might face far less friendly circumstances for taking advantage of this strategy in the future.

What the Next Decade Might Bring

Vanguard’s report concludes that, whatever comes next, a close examination of the way local housing markets have evolved over the last 40 years shows the period that has followed the Great Recession has been “highly unusual.”

“Against this friendly backdrop for retiring and relocating, home ownership in one local market has generally provided a relatively good hedge for destination markets,” the paper explains. “Moving forward, should local housing markets disconnect and the importance of local-market-specific growth return, it may become significantly more disruptive for retirees to retire and relocate.”

Should the historical pattern reemerge, a desired retirement destination may very well cost more rather than less, especially if it becomes popular and its appreciation outpaces that of the current pre-retirement residence.

According to Vanguard, this dynamic could lead to an increase in adaptive behaviors such as increased flexibility among those who need to prioritize accessing home equity. One option would be “locking it in” by selling and renting in the current pre-retirement location — at least for a few years.

Ultimately, the paper suggests, home equity represents one of the most prevalent and often the most significant source of wealth for American households entering retirement, but there has not been a commensurate focus on the use of this wealth in retirement.

“Our results challenge the narrative that housing wealth is off-limits to most retirees,” the authors suggest. “A natural avenue for future research is to incorporate the retire-and-relocate strategy when assessing retirement readiness across the country.”

(Image: Adobe Stock)


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.