Podcast Center
Video Center
Webcasts
Resource Center
Events
By 
October 20, 2022 at 04:49 PM
What You Need to Know
- Waiting to claim Social Security until age 70 can substantially increase lifetime benefits, but delaying payments can be challenging.
- Social Security ‘bridge strategies’ help retirees source adequate income while they wait for full claiming age.
- One expert says advisors and their clients may want to consider the use of reverse mortgages as a core component of a bridge strategy and to help address sequence of returns risk.
During a recent discussion with ThinkAdvisor, Christian Mills, head of financial advisor relations with Reverse Mortgage Funding, noted how excited many Americans are in anticipation of next year’s 8.7% cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security benefits.
The adjustment will increase the average monthly payment by more than $140 starting in January 2023, Mills says, marking the largest jump Social Security checks have seen in 40 years. Mills says the development is welcome news to retirees who have been grappling with near-record inflation and some of the rockiest equity and bond markets seen in many decades.
Reflecting on his ongoing discussions with retirement-focused financial advisors, Mills says the Social Security COLA, the current pace of inflation and the reemergence of severe sequence of returns risk are taking up much of the oxygen in the room. The other big topic he hears about these days is the creation of “bridging strategies” that can help retirees who leave the workforce at 62 or 65 wait until the full Social Security claiming age of 70 to begin drawing income from the federal program.
As Mills notes, there is always significant nuance in financial planning, but the vast majority of retirement-focused advisors believe firmly in the wisdom of delaying Social Security payments as long as possible. The commonly cited rule is that each year of delay will deliver approximately 8% greater monthly payments in the future. This increase is often billed, Mills says, as free excess return, and that’s a pretty good way to think about it, in his estimation.
Where there is markedly less agreement is on the best ways to help clients actually accomplish this goal. Mills says the question of how to source and organize such “bridge” income from the retirement age to the full claiming age will always hinge on the facts and circumstances confronting a given client.
Some lucky clients with a high enough net worth many simply have enough cash on hand to build that bridge. Others may be able to rely on private pension payments, or on systematic withdrawals from a defined contribution-style retirement plan, such as a 401(k). In certain other cases, the purchase of private annuities can make sense as part of a bridging strategy.
These are all viable approaches that deserve consideration, Mills says, but he says more advisors should also consider what he sees as a unjustly overlooked opportunity: the use of reverse mortgages as a Social Security bridge solution.
According to Mills, it is important for retirement-focused advisors to understand that the vast majority of Americans who choose to utilize reverse mortgages are actually in the mass affluent or high-net-worth segments of the population. These Americans tend to own significant housing wealth, Mills explains, and so it is only natural that they would be the ones to seek out opportunities to leverage that equity in pursuit of their broader financial goals.
“For example, we often see the use of reverse mortgage home equity proceeds going to help grandchildren buy a first house, or perhaps to help grandkids settle their college tuition or student loan debt,” Mills says. “Many people with substantial means use reverse mortgages to start passing on their wealth while they are still alive and can enjoy the process.”
