Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
charts of stocks and bonds declining with 3 men watchig

Portfolio > Portfolio Construction > Active

Active Funds Lag Passive Peers in Volatile Market: Morningstar

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • Only 40% of nearly 3,000 active funds across Morningstar’s 20 categories survived and outperformed their average passively managed peer.
  • Just 1 in 4 active funds exceeded the average of their passive rivals over the 10-year period through June 2022.
  • The barometer results cast doubt on the credit afforded active managers to nimbly navigate troubled markets.

Even in a volatile market considered ideal for stock pickers, actively managed funds on the whole have lagged their passive peers, Morningstar reported Tuesday.

Active funds underperformed their passive peers more often than not for the 12 months through June 2022, with results for the group slightly worse than in calendar year 2021, according to the research firm’s semiannual U.S. Active/Passive Barometer.

Only 40% of nearly 3,000 active funds analyzed across Morningstar’s 20 categories survived and outperformed their average passively managed peer, the firm said. In calendar year 2021, Morningstar found that 47% of active funds topped their average passive peers.

Active bond fund managers proved more successful than active stock pickers and slightly outpaced passive peers, although their success rates declined significantly from 2021, according to the report.

“Economic, geopolitical and logistical headwinds torpedoed U.S. stock and bond markets in 2022’s first half. Yet most active funds failed to capitalize on what was proclaimed to be a stock-picker’s market,” the firm said in the report.

“In general, actively managed funds have failed to survive and beat their average passive peer, especially over longer time horizons,” with only 1 in 4 active funds exceeding the average of their passive rivals over the 10-year period through June 2022, Morningstar said.

Among other findings:

  • U.S. stock-pickers’ one-year success rate was over 45% midway through 2022, slightly higher than their 2021 performance. “Active mid- and small-cap funds paved the way with success rates of 48% and 55%, respectively, while large caps’ 40% success rate weighed on the overall rate of success of U.S. active managers,” Morningstar reported.
  • Longer term, in the decade through June 2022, 10.7% of active U.S. large-cap funds survived and outperformed their average passive peer, compared with success rates of 24.7% and 31.7% among active mid- and small-cap funds, respectively.
  • Only 29% of active fixed income funds bested their average index peer over the 12 months through June 2022, with the success rate for active managers across the three fixed income categories dropping 44 percentage points from 2021. Active high-yield bond managers achieved a 31.9% success rate, while only 22.2% of active corporate bond funds outpaced their passive peers.
  • Just under 43% of active bond funds survived and outperformed passive peers for the decade through June this year.
  • Success rates for active foreign stock funds declined in all six categories reviewed, translating to a combined 23% one-year success rate, far below their 37% performance in 2021.
  • Ten-year data for U.S. large-cap funds indicates the probability and penalty for picking an underperforming manager tend to be greater than the probability and reward for finding a winner, while the inverse tends to be true for fixed income and certain foreign-stock categories analyzed, the report said.
  • U.S. large-cap growth active managers “have had a particularly difficult time delivering value for investors” in the long term. “Nearly 67% of the active funds that existed in this category 20 years ago have died, and just 2.2% managed to both survive and outperform their average passive peer.”
  • Over the past decade, the average dollar invested in active funds outperformed the average active fund in most U.S. categories, suggesting investors favored “cheaper, higher-quality” funds.

“Active managers who are afforded flexibility in their mandates are more capable of navigating market volatility than their rigid passive peers — or so the thinking goes,” Bryan Armour, director of passive strategies research for North America at Morningstar Research Services LLC, wrote in a article Monday.

The barometer results, however, cast doubt on the credit afforded active managers for nimbly navigating troubled markets, he added.

“When viewed as a whole, an active fund had below a coin flip’s chance of surviving and outperforming its average passive peer over the 12 months through June 2022, although results varied widely across asset classes and categories,” Armour wrote.

The U.S. Active/Passive Barometer spans nearly 8,400 funds, about half of which survived and represented about $15.6 trillion in assets, or about 69% of the U.S. fund market, at this year’s  midpoint, Morningstar said.


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.