Advisors embracing or considering environmental, social and governance focused investing should understand the different definitions used by asset managers, index providers, stock and bond issuers as well as their clients.
“ESG is not just about values but includes the underlying financial material risks within an industry,” said Mona Naqvi, senior director, ESG, at S&P Dow Jones Indices, a panelists at the Inside ETFs conference in Hollywood, Florida.
Jordan Farris, head of ESG product development at Nuveen, described four different capabilities for ESG:
• exclusionary screening of companies based on ethical values, regulations or norm-based violations
• best-in-class sectors and companies with superior ESG performance relative to their industry
• climate investment solutions, whereby asset allocation is aligned with the transition to a low-carbon economy
• ESG integration, which incorporates ESG data into the investment process to improve risk-adjusted returns
Farris scores companies from zero to 10 within each sector, comparing, for example, health care companies to one another rather than to companies in other industries such as energy.
Morningstar, in contrast, does the opposite in its recently revised ESG ratings, which account for material ESG risk differences between industries as well as between companies within a particular industry. In its new rating system, a tech company ranks higher on the ESG scale than an oil company because of its more limited impact on the environment and is also scored against other companies within the tech sector.
Index providers also differ on ESG scores. Nathalie Wallace, global head of ESG investment strategy at State Street Global Advisors, who was also on the panel, found that the ESG scoring system of two of the largest ESG index providers, MSCI and Sustainalytics, had a correlation of just over half (53.5%).