Close Close
Sign In
Newsletters
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
Podcast Center Video Center Webcasts Resource Center Events
About ThinkAdvisor Contact Us Advertise With Us Asset & Logo Licensing Sitemap Terms of Service Privacy Policy Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
ThinkAdvisor

Retirement Planning > Saving for Retirement

Workers Regret Not Saving More for Retirement: Study

By Michael S. Fischer

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Some 90% of retirement plan participants in American Century Investments’ recently released fifth annual plan participant study expressed regret about their retirement savings habits.

The number of pre-retirees in the 55-to-65 age group who reported having a great deal of regret rose by 5% in the past two years, the study found.

“Not saving for retirement was cited as the most common personal regret — more than not being a better person or having better personal relationships,” American Century Investments vice president for client marketing Diane Gallagher said in a statement.

“People recognize the importance of saving but lack that general direction or push to get started.”

Washington, D.C.-based Mathew Greenwald and Associates conducted a survey during the third quarter among 1,500 full-time workers between ages 25 and 65 who were participating in their employer’s retirement plan, intended to retire at some point and were not working for the government.

Study participants said the first five years of their working lives was the period of time for which they had the most regret, with more than 90% saying it would be “at least somewhat important to tell their younger selves to save more.”

But 75% acknowledged that their early-career self would be only “somewhat or very likely” to accept that advice.

Participants cited several common barriers to saving: not earning enough, having debts to pay off and incurring unexpected expenses.

Asked to grade how well they did in putting away money for retirement, given their resources and circumstances, study participants gave themselves a ‘C.’

“We continue to see this disconnect in people knowing what they ‘should do’ against what they actually do with respect to saving,” Gallagher said. “Although participants recognize that responsibility and gravity, they still struggle with overcoming inertia to move forward.”

Employers’ Influence

The study results underscored how important employers’ influence on participants saving for retirement is.

Survey respondents gave their employers a ‘B-’ for the job they had done providing a retirement plan that offered the opportunity to save, invest and accumulate retirement savings. Nearly half said their employer’s role was critical in getting them to save.

The survey posed two hypotheticals. Offered the option of receiving either a 100% match on their 3%-of-salary retirement plan contributions or a 3% higher salary, which would participants take? Seventy-seven percent of pre-retirees and 75% of younger respondents said they would take the match.

When asked about substituting 6% for 3%, 78% of pre-retirees and 69% of the others chose the match.

Some four-fifths of participants said they considered the defined contribution plan one of the most important benefits, and two out of three said they felt positive about a company that offered auto-enrollment, automatic increases and target-date funds.

Asked about state-run retirement plans in which employers automatically enroll employees if they do not offer a plan of their own, 57% of pre-retirees and 58% of younger participants said they would prefer an employer-run plan.

“The idea that employees would accept a higher match over higher salary may have implications for plan sponsors and their consultants in structuring compensation and benefit programs,” Gallagher said. “It is certainly a perspective that is worth examining within a particular organization.”

The research showed how important automatic plan features are to participants, who welcomed defaults around saving rates and investments to help them start to save.

The vast majority of respondents agreed that the company for which they worked should offer automatic features, with 75% believing automatic enrollment at 6% was something the company should do and more than 60% saying it should be implemented retroactively.

Eighty percent of participants showed at least some interest in a regular, incremental automatic increase, and a similar percentage supported plan investment re-enrollment into target-date solutions.

Recent research showed that a growing number of defined contribution plans offered by large employers are adding auto-enrollment, auto-escalation of contributions and Roth options as enhancements to their plans.

— Check out There’s a Hole in the Retirement Bucket Strategy on ThinkAdvisor.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.