Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor

Retirement Planning > Saving for Retirement

Putnam CEO Faults 401(k) Shift as ‘Tax Gimmick’ Hurting the Poor

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Putnam Investments chief executive Robert Reynolds called 401(k) changes floated as part of a possible tax overhaul “misguided” and a “gimmick” that would target younger workers and middle- to low-income employees, the very groups that need to save the most.

Reynolds said that any attempt to limit the pretax contributions workers could set aside for those retirement accounts should be shelved.

“‘Rothification’ is a bad idea because it goes after the workers that you want to participate and contribute,” Reynolds said Tuesday at a conference in Washington held by LIMRA. “To go after that set through tax reform is a misguided principle, and it is a tax gimmick.”

(Related: Robert Reynolds: Here’s How Workplace Plans Can Save Retirement)

The comments come as debate over the issue continues in Washington. President Donald Trump tweeted Monday that there would be no changes to 401(k)s after reports that Republicans were considering limiting pretax contributions, a move that could help bolster revenue to pay for tax cuts. That measure had been drawing scrutiny from the retirement industry, which benefits from the flows into those accounts.

Heads of the House and Senate tax-writing committees have pushed back after the president’s tweet, signaling that retirement changes could still be on the table.

Reynolds helped to build one of the biggest 401(k) businesses while at Fidelity Investments and wrote a book about workplace savings. His current company increased the size of its 401(k) record-keeping business with the purchase of a unit from JPMorgan Chase & Co. in 2014.

Larger Problem

Making it so that the contributions entering the 401(k)s would be after-tax earnings — similar to how Roth individual retirement accounts are treated — could create a larger problem for middle-to-lower income workers, Reynolds said. It could also discourage younger workers from saving, meaning they’d miss out on the benefits of compound interest.

“They look at that pretax as help from the government to make that contribution,” Reynolds said.

Thomas Marra, who leads Sumitomo Life Insurance Co.’s Symetra Financial Corp. and was on the same panel, agreed. While limiting pretax contributions could help increase tax revenues, it would lead to people saving less for retirement, Marra said.

The New York Times reported Friday that House Republicans were considering limiting pretax 401(k) contributions to as little as $2,400 annually, a move Marra said would really set things back. The World Economic Forum has estimated that there could be about a $400 trillion retirement savings shortfall by 2050.

“I think it’s ill-conceived to touch 401(k)s,” Marra said.

—-Read New GOP Tax Framework Includes Caregiver Tax Credit on ThinkAdvisor

 


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.