Podcast Center
Video Center
Webcasts
Resource Center
Events
August 14, 2017 at 05:30 AM
Nearly 30 years have passed since William Sharpe introduced returns-based style analysis (RBSA) to the investment world in his landmark article, “Determining a Fund’s Effective Asset Mix.” In 1992, RBSA became commercially available through Zephyr StyleAdvisor. Numerous other software programs have followed suit by offering RBSA within their applications.
Below we revisit RBSA, compare it to holdings-based style analysis, and explain how a financial advisor should use RBSA today to help create an effective asset mix for their clients.
Style analysis dates back to the ’70s when institutional consultants detected different patterns of returns for managers who employed different investment processes. This difference in return behavior lead to the term “style.” Consultants then started to label managers according to style.
During this time, it became clear that the return behavior of these unique styles was cyclical. There were periods of time when value stocks outperformed growth stocks and vice versa. A manager’s skill did not determine these cycles, as they were simply a function of the market, or systematic risk factors. Figure 1 displays this style behavior, as we examine the excess returns of the Russell 1000 Growth (blue line) and Russell 1000 Value (red line) indexes over the Russell 1000 index (black horizontal line at 0%.). This behavior does not apply strictly to growth vs value, as a similar trend could appear when comparing large caps versus small caps. This example shows the importance of recognizing a manager’s style to identify an appropriate benchmark and building a diversified portfolio.
Returns-based style analysis and holdings-based analysis, also commonly referred to as security analysis, provide investment professionals different ways to identify a manager’s style. You may ask, which methodology is better? The answer lies with the individual, and since both methodologies are complementary. The questions you may want to ask yourself are, “Do you prefer a methodology that looks at what a manager actually invests in?” or, “Do you prefer to look at how a manager behaves?”
Security analysis is completed by looking at the characteristics of the underlying constituents and calculating valuation metrics like price-to-book, price-to-earnings ratio, earnings growth and size. As one can expect, it takes time and money to go back in time and calculate these metrics for all the historical fund holdings, in search of noticeable trends. Often, fund managers do not want to disclose their “secret sauce” in a timely manner, which can lead to delayed or inaccurate holdings information. When creating a diversified portfolio, it can be very advantageous to know the holdings of each manager, to make sure the security overlap is low, and to confirm the level of security diversification.
Rather than determining the manager’s style by looking at the actual holdings, RBSA identifies the style by looking at the manager’s behavior. Sharpe recognized that by using a manager’s historical returns, along with the returns of selected indexes, one could determine the combination of indexes that is most highly correlated with the manager’s returns. Sharpe referred to a manager’s return behavior as his “tracks in the sand.”
