This tax season could turn out to be particularly uncomfortable one for mutual fund investors and their advisors. Despite losses or small gains in most major markets last year, many mutual funds distributed capital gains to investors who, in turn, have to pay taxes on those gains even though they made little or no profit on those investments and may even have incurred losses.
This “double whammy” is even more pronounced if the fund distributions were short-term capital gains, which are taxed at an investor’s income tax rate rather than the lower long-term capital gains of 15% or 20% for many investors, depending on their tax rate. (The 2015 capital gains rate is 23.8% for investors with a modified adjusted gross income above $413,200 filing as a single taxpayer or above $464,850 for those filing jointly as a married couple.)
“There is a general lack of understanding of the headwinds that taxes cause,” says Frank Pape, director of consulting services for Russell Investments’ private client services group.
For one thing, taxes can turn fund gains into losses. Take the example of a $100,000 fund portfolio that gained 0.5% before taxes, or $500, and distributed 10% of its NAV in capital gains (the average distribution was 9.7%, in 2015, according to Pape). That would cost an investor in the top tax bracket slightly more than $2,300, turning a $500 gain into an $1800 loss.
What Your Peers Are Reading
This tax liability is a “hidden expense ratio” that advisors and investors should consider when choosing mutual funds, says Pape.
He says the average equity mutual fund has given up more than 1% a year in taxable distributions over the past 10 years, and the forfeiture is not limited to actively managed funds. While actively managed large-cap funds have forfeited 1.17% to taxable distributions, passively managed large caps have given up 0.8%, says Pape. The numbers are even higher for small-cap funds.
In 2015, taxable contributions were especially high for a number of funds. Of the equity funds that distributed capital gains, 15% had a distribution that was greater than 15% of their NAV.