Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor

Life Health > Health Insurance > Health Insurance

What to call biologic copycats? FDA proposes names with suffixes

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

(Bloomberg) — Cheaper versions of biotechnology drugs in the U.S. will be distinguished from the expensive brand-name medicine they imitate by attaching a suffix to their generic name, the Food and Drug Administration proposed, a plan that may affect how doctors prescribe the treatments.

See also: Plans in showdown against high-cost drugs

Brand-name biologics, which are made from living organisms instead of chemicals like traditional drugs, would also carry a suffix, the agency said in a blog post. The FDA is seeking public comment on the proposal before it issues final guidance.

Doctors typically use generic names — called non-proprietary names, in FDA nomenclature — to prescribe drugs, often leaving it up to pharmacists to decide which company’s products drugmakers choose to hand over to patients. In the traditional world of chemical drugs, brand-name medications and their generic copies carry the same name. For example, Pfizer Inc.’s Lipitor is atorvastatin, and all generics go by atorvastatin.

But since biosimilars aren’t exact copies of their brand-name competitors, a debate has emerged over whether they should have a common name.

Inadvertent substitutions 

The FDA said its proposal would help prevent pharmacists from inadvertently substituting one drug for another when the agency has determined the drugs aren’t interchangeable. It would also make it easier to track the safety of each manufacturer’s drugs, the FDA said.

See also: Obama pushes trade partners to add drug rules he opposes in U.S.

The agency also said it hasn’t yet decided whether biosimilars that are considered interchangeable, which means they can be substituted for a brand-name version at the pharmacy counter, would require a unique suffix or share the same as the brand they copy. The FDA hasn’t yet released guidance on what it will require of companies to prove their biosimilars are interchangeable.

The issues are arising because the FDA only recently was given the authority to approve copies of biosimilars. Thus far it has cleared one  — Novartis AG’s version of Amgen Inc.’s Neupogen.

The active ingredient in Neupogen is filgrastim, and the FDA made Zarxio’s name filgrastim-sndz. The FDA now says all biosimilars would receive a suffix, though the four lowercase letters won’t have meaning.

See also: Health cost fight boils over

The blog post gave an example of the made-up brand replicamab-cznm. A biosimilar to that product could be replicamab-hixf, the agency said.

—With assistance from Catherine Larkin in Chicago.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.