Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Regulation and Compliance > State Regulation

Schwab Settles 2009 Auction-Rate Securities Suit

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Charles Schwab Corp. and New York agreed to settle a 2009 lawsuit in which the state accused the firm of promoting auction-rate securities as safe while failing to disclose the risks before the market for them froze.

New York claimed Schwab engaged in “fraudulent and deceptive conduct” in promoting the investments. Auction-rate securities are municipal bonds, corporate bonds and preferred stocks whose rates of return are periodically reset through auctions. Andrew Cuomo, then attorney general, brought the suit.

The settlement was disclosed in a filing in state Supreme Court in Manhattan. No terms were provided. Schwab and New York said in a November filing that they were in talks to end the case.

The $330 billion worldwide market for auction-rate securities collapsed during the 2008 credit crunch as potential buyers vanished. The crisis sparked regulatory investigations and lawsuits alleging that underwriters and brokers had falsely promoted the securities as safe, cash-like investments.

Liz DeBold, a spokeswoman for current Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, confirmed the settlement and declined to comment further. Sarah Bulgatz, a spokeswoman for San Francisco-based Schwab, said in an e-mail that the company is pleased to have the matter resolved.

Schwab said in an SEC filing in November that it’s been responding to “industrywide inquiries” from federal and state regulators about sales to clients who couldn’t trade their holdings when the “normal auction process for those securities froze unexpectedly in February 2008.”

A Manhattan judge in 2011 granted Schwab’s bid to dismiss the case after the firm said the complaint didn’t cite statements that were false when made or identify who made any misstatements. An appeals court reinstated two of four claims in 2013, saying the state presented enough evidence for a trial.

The case is New York v. Schwab, 453388/2009, New York State Supreme Court, New York County (Manhattan).

– To contact the reporter on this story: Chris Dolmetsch in New York State Supreme Court in Manhattan at [email protected] To contact the editors responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at [email protected] David Glovin, Andrew Dunn


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.