Close Close

Life Health > Life Insurance

Your official life insurance M&A outlook for 2015

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

It might not be the end of 2014 yet, but we’re already looking back at the mergers and acquisitions in the insurance industry this year and looking toward what 2015 might bring. A report back in March of 2014 from Deloitte found that M&A activity in the insurance industry had cooled down significantly compared to 2013. Some industry observers expressed “cautious optimism about 2014,” according to the report.

However, the three panelists at last week’s Insurance M&A Trends and Outlook podcast, hosted by SNL, beg to differ, if only a little bit. While emerging markets have shown some signs of slowing down — Bloomberg reported that China Life Insurance lost 2 percent on the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index (HSCEI), but Brazil gained 1.8 percent in their stock market — other observers estimate that emerging markets’ GDPs will increase from 35 percent to 50 percent in the next decade, according to Morningstar, encouraging industry players to continue to expand their markets internationally.

This trend, in tandem with growing emergent markets here at home — including the unexploited middle-marketmillennials and the LGBT community — and expectations that the economy in the U.S. will experience growth for the remainder of 2014 seems to leave plenty of opportunities for insurance companies to expand.

Here are some of the comments and lessons from SNL’s podcast.

snl outlook two

1. Although volume is down, we’re doing better than in 2013.

According to Tim Zawacki, moderator of the podcast and senior industry editor at SNL Financial, “Not only does the aggregate deal value compare favorably in the last two years, it also compares favorably to 2014. We’d only need a few aggregate deals to surpass 2013’s numbers. We’d need a blockbuster deal or two to approach 2010, however,” he added.

All of this despite the fact that there was a “sharp drop-off in the number of transactions announced” for life insurance M&A, Zawacki concluded. 


2. Companies are looking for higher growth markets internationally.

Life insurance products are still seeing low numbers in terms of sales, combined with a retiring boomer market that is more concerned with “retirement or asset accumulation products” than life insurance, said Michael A. Cohen, principal of Cohen Strategic Consulting and former vice president of A.M Best Co. during the podcast. Despite this, the annuities sector is experiencing growth.

Another trend that has been taking over the industry is investment diversification, both of companies going overseas and in the U.S. from international companies taking interest in acquiring our markets, so says Nicholas Potter, a corporate partner of Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, co-chair of the firm’s Financial Institutions Group and a member of the firm’s Mergers & Acquisitions and Securities Groups.

“We saw deals like Dai-chi, a publicly traded company, responding to impulses from the heart of the Japanese government, looking to diversify investments into the U.S. It’s been very different from what we had been seeing in recent years. This year, what we have seen is a response to some significant macro-economic trends,” he added.

Also, life insurers managing their exposure to mortality risks marks another kind of trend. For example, “TIAA-CREF lowered exposure by buying Nuveen to increase their scale and strengthen exposure to asset management; those are some dynamics that we can see in terms of consolidation,” said Boris Lukan, principal, insurance M&A leader at Deloitte Consulting LLP. 


3. Regulation is both a catalyst and an impediment for growth.

Nothing strikes fear in the hearts of the industry men and women more than a regulator sighting, or one at a table. And that is the industry’s feeling when it comes to the regulatory environment, “uncertain, unsettled and that undoubtedly would, generally speaking, tend to dampen M&A activity,” commented Lukan.    

“On the other hand, heightened capital requirements are likely to force organizations to reconsider their commitment to certain lines of business which would perhaps stimulate supply, but heightened regulation has been an impediment to progress,” added Lukan.

And Potter seems to agree: “I think at the end of the day, you end up with one catalyst and one impediment and the companies are going to think about private equity. The capital rules are still evolving, but you’re seeing M&A in response to those rules. It’s a neutral or maybe arguably a positive in terms of the environment of M&A,” he said.


4. Private equity firms are here to stay.

Although all three experts agreed that private equity firms have been most active purchasing annuity businesses, it’s because of that activity that the current market has a lower supply of annuity businesses that they can acquire or merge with.

But, in the coming year, should we expect these firms to be active acquirers or continuous consolidators? “The less important issue that is extremely important, but less important than the opportunity than they see to acquire insurance assets, particularly annuity assets, is the need to consolidate what they’re buying and have an operation that runs effectively. The consolidation aspect should not be ignored, but the bigger opportunity here is for them to acquire more businesses,” said Cohen.

“I think that private equity has, to some extent, figured out the insurance industry how and where to make money. Now that the regulatory cloud has dissipated a little bit, the private equity crowd is here to stay,” Potter concluded.


5. Exposure and risk must be managed wisely. 

Everyone wants to climb to the summit of that mountain and experience what its like to acquire a competitor or what it means to merge with a new business venture and expand the market. In fact, that seems to be an industry expectation, says Potter. “Companies are going to be a little bit more adventurous and are looking to diversify into new markets. This is a trend that’s not going away. Companies are now seeing a need in response to regulatory changes to go out and look for new business lines. As an advisor, I’m always more comfortable when clients are going and looking into businesses that I know they know well, or markets that they know well,” he said.

Meanwhile, Lukan recommended that, “For U.S. companies that are looking to expand into new markets overseas or organizations who are coming to the U.S. for the first time, strengthening their capabilities around sufficient oversight and control of these acquired entities is really important. In some cases, this might entail opening like a regional office that can interface with headquarters that [may be] distant in geography,” but figuring that out before making a move is key to a successful M&A.

Lastly, companies have to study their markets very, very well before moving into “uncharted” territory, according to Cohen.

best practices

6. To succeed, companies must follow best practices and learn from past deals.

One of the experts, Nicholas Potter, stressed the importance of being a sort of “future teller” where one would look at everything about that M&A and see if anything could potentially become a regulatory issue. “[Companies should] constantly be sort of front running regulatory and litigation changes and thinking in advance where is that going to pop up. The single number one aspect is to avoid pitfalls and to think where the risk resides, even if it’s in the future,” Potter said.

On the other hand, Cohen said that another great lesson that companies should learn is about paying enough attention to the people. “The biggest reasons why these transactions fail are because of people, the culture, people’s job security, the approach that they’ve used to run their business. They’re having many conflicts. There are executives’ egos. There’s so many people here and getting them on the table, managing them, before and after, etc. It’s virtually impossible to pay too much attention [to these issues].”


7. Experts are split on whether there will be more consolidations.

When asked this question on a poll during the podcast, the experts were divided. For Lukan, the answer depends greatly on “if you’re solving for optimal industry-wide returns on capital, then yes, further consolidation would be necessary. For sure there’s a lot companies out there with a lot of fragmentation, then you’ve got an accelerator for transactions,” he said. And with the many M&As in the industry creating an environment of scarcity, making fewer companies of scale available, “It’s harder for deals to matter to companies that are able to afford a purchase,” Lukan said.

However, Cohen disagreed. He said that there’s no need for further consolidation and that, ”There’s no invisible hand saying, ‘Here’s the right number of [insurance] companies.’” But the companies that will remain will do so on their own merit by earning the right to do that. “If they’re profitable, if they satisfy the customers and their stakeholders, they will exist, and if they don’t, they will have to leave. And those that have to leave would be better served if they did sooner rather than later because they would get better values [for their companies],” he cautioned.

Meanwhile Potter said that the life insurance sector is one that does remain highly fragmented.

See also:

Reaching the middle market on their (digital) terms


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.