Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Retirement Planning > Social Security

PBGC Halts Employer Shutdown Cases

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

After complaints, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. announced Tuesday that it is placing a six-month moratorium on the enforcement of facility shutdown cases under Section 4062(e) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.

PBGC said in a release that the moratorium, to last until Dec. 31, will enable it to ensure that “its efforts are targeted to cases where pensions are genuinely at risk,” and allow PBGC to work with the business community, Department of Labor and other stakeholders.

Under Section 4062(e), if an employer with a pension plan shuts down operations at a facility, and as a result of that shutdown, more than 20% of the employer’s employees who are plan participants are separated from employment, the employer is required to provide the PBGC with short-term security in the form of a bond or escrow amount based on the plan’s unfunded termination liability.

Typically, PBGC asks companies that are on the brink of a shutdown to increase the plan’s funding, so it’s less likely to fail. In the past seven years, PBGC says that it has used 4062(e) to protect pensions covering 180,000 people in 35 states.

During the moratorium, PBGC says that it will cease enforcement efforts on open and new cases. “Companies should continue to report new 4062(e) events, but PBGC will take no action on those events during the moratorium,” PBGC said.

James Klein, president of the American Benefits Council, said in a statement that PBGC’s moratorium is “welcome news,” as the ABC has“repeatedly communicated our concern about PBGC’s enforcement of the law to the agency, itself, and to Congress.” This “temporary halt,” Klein said, “will ensure that future enforcement is applied as intended.”

In 2012, PBGC said that it began responding to business concerns by targeting its 4062(e) enforcement, focusing on those cases where there was “real risk of substantial plan failure.” PBGC decided at the time that companies that meet standard tests of financial soundness or have fewer than 100 participants would not be required to provide financial guarantees.

This 2012 change exempted more than 90% of plan sponsors from 4062(e) enforcement, PBGC said, and in FY 2013, only 63 companies were found to have taken actions within the law’s purview, and PBGC declined to enforce in 80% of those cases.

Check out Fear and Loathing at PBGC on ThinkAdvisor.


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.