A Fresh Look at Portfolio Construction: Setting Goals With the Client

The lower boundary of acceptable risk (the investor’s risk tolerance) is determined by first calculating the historical mean or annualized rate of return and standard deviation of the portfolio. Using that information we can easily determine the upper and lower boundaries of return at any specified probability level.  In most cases you will use the 90% probability value. A lower boundary that is greater than the prospect’s Risk Profile (i.e., 12.5% compared to a Risk Profile of -5.0%) indicates that the portfolio is riskier than desired. 

At the 90% level:

Upper boundary = 1.654 * STD + Mean ROR

Lower boundary = 1.654 * STD – Mean ROR 

The lower the asset standard deviations and the greater the degree of negative correlation, the lower the portfolio risk will be.  

Metrics indicating that the current portfolio exhibits excessive risk and is underperforming:

• Downside risk/Lower Boundary is greater than established in the investor’s Risk Profile indicates that the portfolio is too risky. 

• Maximum Drawdown is high indicating excessive volatility. 

• Sharpe Ratio is low (under 0.80) indicates that the portfolio is very inefficient (poor asset allocation).

• Correlations are low indicating poor asset/security selection. 

Metrics alone will not tell you if a portfolio is too volatile or underperforming. An asset with a higher standard deviation may not indicate greater volatility since a higher rate of return might reflect greater incremental return per unit of change in standard deviation. Establish a set of metrics that you can consistently use to review the risk/return characteristics of the portfolio and its relationship to the investor’s Risk Profile. 

Step 3: Financial Objectives (Goal Setting) 

In general, the primary objective for any investment portfolio is to provide sufficient capital and income for the investor to live “comfortably” in post-retirement years. Evaluating the success of your scenario could include Monte Carlo simulations and/or straight-line cash flow analysis using estimated returns and standard deviations. While it is not necessary to have a detailed estate plan in place for most investors, nonetheless it is important that some objectives are clearly set out and that the probability of achieving those goals is evaluated by your portfolio analytical tools. You will require a sophisticated analytical tool that will establish clear financial objectives and quickly determine if the current or proposed portfolios are likely to achieve those objectives. 

• What financial goals does the investor want to achieve (retirement, college, major purchases, etc.)? 
• What is the start and end date of each goal? 
• How much risk is the investor willing to accept to achieve each goal? 
• How much money can he invest towards the goals now and in the future? 
• How much money will be needed to achieve the goals based on expected return?

Summing Up

Most individual investors acquire assets without much, if any, consideration given to their financial objectives, expected portfolio rates of return, risk, and the inter-relationship or balance of the assets involved.They generally end up with a mix of unrelated investments which, as a whole, can never fulfill the investor’s policies and objectives. Advisors need to design portfolios that will achieve financial objectives by matching assets according to risk/return trade-offs. If capital is allocated efficiently, portfolio returns will generally be higher over the long-term, and portfolio volatility will be lower. 

In the third and final installment, we will discuss portfolio construction and asset class suitability; designing the proposed portfolio including forecasting performance and optimizing portfolios;  finding appropriate investment vehicles; and achieving established financial goals.