The roots of financial planning are in those insurance agents and stockbrokers who sought out a way to deliver better advice and guidance to their clients. Similarly, the roots of financial planning education have long been in ‘adult education’ certificate programs that took experienced and active advisors back to school to gain the educational knowledge they needed to sit for the CFP exam and earn their CFP certification.
Over the past decade, though, we have witnessed the emerging rise of the ‘financial planning academic,’ those pioneering students who went through the first Ph.D. program from Texas Tech, which was supported in large part by an early $2 million grant from the CFP Board with the specific vision of supporting a growing population of financial planning academics. Having earned their doctorates, these academics are now beginning to go forth and establish undergraduate, graduate and Ph.D. programs at other universities across the country. As the trend continues and the Texas Tech/CFP Board vision is fulfilled, the number of university-based financial planning programs continues to grow, and financial planning is well positioned to gain more academic credibility.
As the financial planning academic community continues to grow, so too are the resources serving them. From the Academy of Financial Services, to the recently re-introduced academic track at the FPA annual conference, to the CFP Board’s latest round academic initiatives, including a new ‘think tank’ financial planning research center and a new academic journal, financial planning is well positioned to continue its drive forward towards increasing academic rigor and recognition. That is likely to include not only a rising volume of college-educated financial planners but perhaps research that will slay a few financial planning sacred cows and help to advance not only the financial planning body of knowledge but how it is applied by practitioners.
The Rise of Financial Planning University Programs
To see where we may be going, let’s first look at where we’ve come from. The first class for CFP certificants dates back to 1973. However, the reality is that for its first 15 years, the education of financial planners was the domain of adult education programs, specifically, the early version of the College for Financial Planning. The educational track was developed for those who had been in the industry for years already as a life insurance agents or stockbrokers who wanted to transition his/her practice towards financial planning. In 1985, the CFP Board was officially spun off from the College of Financial Planning to become a standalone organization to maintain the CFP certification standards, and once separated an increasing number of schools were allowed to become CFP Board registered programs, with the first 20 universities recognized in 1987 (see the IBCFP announcement at the time!).
While the number of financial planning programs in degree-granting programs grew in the early years, the pace was slowed significantly by several factors. The first was the general lack of recognition of financial planning as a bona fide profession unto itself, and a perceived lack of rigor that was associated with it. As a result, early financial planning programs were primarily in school divisions ranging from ‘agricultural economics’ to ‘life sciences’ rather than in finance or business programs. The second challenge to financial planning programs at degree-granting institutions was the lack of a credible ‘terminal degree,’ academia-speech for a Ph.D. end point, for those who were teaching financial planning and creating programs. Simply put, it would be difficult for financial planning to ever be fully recognized as such in academia as long as there were no financial planning Ph.D. academics to lead them; of course, the classic chicken-and-egg program was that few programs had any interest in developing a Ph.D. program, either.
Nonetheless, in 2000 the first Ph.D. program in financial planning emerged, from Texas Tech University, and gained momentum 2 years later with a significant $2 million grant from the CFP Board itself. One of the stated early goals of the program was to begin to grow a base of ‘financial planning academics,’ Ph.D.s in financial planning who could go forth and start or lead financial planning programs at other universities and colleges, and raise the academic profile for financial planning itself.
The Rise of The Financial Planning Academic
Since the Texas Tech Ph.D. program started, it has gone on to mint 30 Ph.D.s (and nine more who have done everything but their dissertation, or ‘ABDs’), many of whom have been instrumental in launching or sustaining what are now five Ph.D. programs in financial planning. Those programs are at Texas Tech itself, at the universities of Georgia and Missouri, at Kansas State University and most recently at Louisiana State University (now the first CFP Board-registered financial planning Ph.D. program in an AACSB-accredited business school).
The CFP Board has reported that there are three more Ph.D. programs in development. Texas Tech graduates staff not only four of the five current Ph.D. programs, but have also been instrumental in the development and support of several undergraduate CFP Board-registered programs as well, from Utah Valley University to the award-winning students at William Patterson University in New Jersey. Consistent with the original vision to support the growth of financial planning academia, nearly 90% of the Texas Tech Ph.D. graduates remain in academia growing and supporting programs; only about 10% have gone on to ‘private industry’ jobs.
The shift of financial planning towards more degree-based institutions has been significant over the past decade. It took 15 years from the first 20 institutions to grow to approximately 54 degree-based institutions when the Texas Tech Ph.D. program launched (in addition to even more adult certificate-based programs), and there are now 95 degree-based institutions offering financial planning programs (many of which offer several programs at the undergraduate and graduate levels).
Over the last four years alone, the number of Baccalaureate programs has increased 33% (while the total number of certificate programs has been stagnant), and of the 54 potential financial planning programs currently in development with CFP Board, the majority are baccalaureate programs within AACSB-accredited schools of business and finance.
The current breakdown of CFP Board-registered programs (seen in the pie chart below) shows that nearly 50% of the programs are now degree-based, after having been dominated by adult education certificate programs in the 1990s and early 2000s. (Note: There are a handful of other doctoral and other programs that overlap financial planning but are not CFP Board-registered, and some institutions sponsor more than one CFP Board registered program simultaneous [e.g., an adult certificate and a separate baccalaureate program].)
The significance of this rise of the financial planning academic cannot be understated. Not only is the growth of degree-based CFP programs supporting growth in the number of students entering the financial planning profession (though many are just studying financial planning without following through into financial planning careers), but for all recognized and bona fide professions, a thriving academic community that conducts research and advances the body of knowledge is crucial to the growth of the profession. As the number of financial planning Ph.D.s continues to grow, so too will the number of university-based financial planning programs, especially at the graduate and doctoral level, which in turn will help to put forth even more financial planning academics.
The Growing Needs of Financial Planning Academia
The significance of the rise of financial planning academics is that they are also emerging as an important constituency unto themselves in the financial planning landscape with their own needs and concerns, and are just now beginning to get new resources and the focus to serve them.
Historically, the organization supporting financial planning academics, and the intersection of academia and financial planning practitioners, was the Academy of Financial Services (AFS), which has a conference in the fall (October 16-17 in Nashville) at which research can be presented.
As financial planning academia has continued to rise, though, other programs have emerged. Last year, the FPA (re-)launched its own academic mini-track at the FPA Experience national conference, which is being repeated on a larger scale in 2014 with a recently announced Call for Academic Papers at their re-branded FPA Business & Education (BE) conference.
(Disclosure: My blog, Nerd’s Eye View, is the first sponsor for this year’s FPA Call for Papers, which will include two $500 prizes, one for “best applied financial planning research” and one for “best theoretical financial planning research”. The submission deadline is May 30th.)
More recently, the CFP Board announced several initiatives, including a new think tank called the Center for Financial Planning aimed at funding academic research in financial planning, encouraging more young students and more gender and racial diversity amongst financial planners as well. It also is launching a new academic journal to give rising academics a new place to publish. That’s a crucial step, as most Ph.D.s need opportunities to publish at credible academic journals to gain tenure at their universities, and there will soon be too few publications to support the number of Ph.D.s.
As the CFP Board, FPA, and other initiatives gain momentum, and the ranks of financial planning academics themselves continue to rise, a new era of financial planning is emerging. That era will increasingly focus on advancing the theoretical and research underpinnings of the body of knowledge that financial planning practitioners implement, in a world where sadly far too much of what is done is based on rules of thumb and conventional wisdom rather than rigorous research and study.
In the process, I suspect that we’ll see a number of cherished sacred cows of financial planning slaughtered, but also an increased opportunity for more productive academic-practitioner research collaboration to occur. Unfortunately, in the past much of the academic research has been very far removed from the practical realities that most financial planners face with their clients. As the number of academic programs increases, so too should the breadth and quality of financial planning students available to enter the profession. That will be so even if we need to produce an ever-larger number of students to account for the fact that not everyone ends up getting a job in their undergraduate major.
In the meantime, if you’d like to check out the latest in financial planning academia – or possibly contribute and get involved yourself – be sure to check out the academic track that will be available as a part of the larger FPA BE annual conference this fall (or consider the AFS’ own event if you’re interested), encourage any academics you know to submit an abstract of own research to try for the new prizes at this year’s Call For Papers, and stay tuned for further developments from the CFP Board’s new journal and the Center for Financial Planning as they launch in the coming year.