Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Retirement Planning > Retirement Investing

Weather forecasts? What about retirement forecasts?

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

This is the time of year where, in many parts of the county, the weather — and weather forecasters — dominate the nightly news coverage, certainly when the predictions are dire. Indeed, having had the opportunity to live in several different parts of the country, I can assure you that the bigger the projected snowfall, the more hyped the coverage.    

Several weeks back, the local meteorologists were all agog about an impending snowfall in the Washington, D.C., area — a snowfall initially projected at two to four inches of accumulation was quickly revised to three to five inches and then to four to seven inches.

The local mass transportation systems sprang into action, announcing alternative schedules, state officials advised those who didn’t need to be on the roads to stay home, non-emergency federal employees in the area were granted an excused absence, while others were directed to telecommute.

As it turned out, it did snow — but not much, and certainly not in the amounts that had garnered all the attention. Afterward, meteorologists were quick to point out that accumulations had matched projections in some areas, although those areas were relatively small and generally far removed from major metropolitan centers. Ultimately, more were affected by the weather forecast than the weather itself.

Dire predictions are also common about the retirement prospects for Americans. You may have seen a recent headline that proclaimed “Americans Are $6.8 Trillion Short On Retirement Savings,” a figure that the article proceeds to tell us amounts to $113,000 per household “for those on the eve of retirement” — that is, those ages 55 to 64. 

Actually, that $6.8 trillion is the low end of a range published by the National Institute on Retirement Security about six months ago, and is close to the $6.6 trillion estimate of the Center for Retirement Research, which we have commented on previously.

Related story: The world braces for retirement crisis

The NIRS projections were largely derived by looking at self-reported retirement account balances, financial assets and net worth from the Federal Reserve’s 2010 Survey of Consumer Finances, incorporating some assumptions about defined benefit assets, and extrapolating target retirement savings needs based on a set of age-based income multipliers — income multipliers, it should be noted, that have no apparent connection with actual income, or with actual spending needs in retirement.  

For public policy purposes, EBRI has long defined adequate retirement income as having the financial resources to cover basic expenses plus uninsured medical costs in retirement. Working from that definition as a starting point, along with an assumption that retirement represents the cessation of paid employment and begins at age 65, we have projected that approximately 44 percent of Baby Boomer and Gen-X households are simulated to be at risk of running short of money in retirement, assuming they retain any net housing equity until other financial resources are depleted. Our most recent assessment of that total aggregate gap between needs and available resources is $4.6 trillion, with an individual average of approximately $48,000. 

That is, of course, a large gap, though one considerably smaller than that highlighted in the headline. While it represents a lot of households — it also includes a wide range of personal circumstances, from individuals projected to run short by as little as a dollar to those projected to fall short by tens of thousands of dollars. For those seeking to understand, and perhaps craft solutions for, the current projected shortfalls, this is an important distinction, and one given short shrift by that headline’s focus. 

A lot of science goes into making weather projections, and yet a temperature difference of a mere degree or two can be the difference between a modest rainfall or a blizzard of epic proportion. Beyond those reality variables, imprecise modeling assumptions can distort forecasts, producing their own disruptions.

When it comes to effective retirement policy, it is, of course, important to be able to quantify just how big the nation’s retirement savings shortfall is. It is, however, perhaps even more important to remember what most retirement plan advisors know — that whether an individual shortfall exists will be a combination of individual circumstances, as well as varying degrees of preparation, access, needs — and advice.


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.