Podcast Center
Video Center
Webcasts
Resource Center
Events
December 16, 2013 at 09:19 AM
If there were any remaining doubt as to what Lawrence Summers would do, had he been named successor to Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke rather than Janet Yellen, an op-ed in Sunday’s Washington Post suggests a decidely dovish stance would have been forthcoming.
Yellen, who assumes her chairmanship of the Fed on Feb. 1, is thought to be accommodationist as well. Since she and Summers were President Barack Obama’s top choices for the Fed and since Summers had previously been the president’s economic policy advisor, Summers’ op-ed may reflect economic policy fears at the highest levels in Washington.
That overarching concern (which may, of course, reflect only the opinion of its author) is that the U.S. is in danger of sinking into a Japan-style stagnation, which, to be pre-empted, requires long-term “unconventional policy support” from the Fed.
as evidence of U.S. structural stagnation, Summers cites an economic recovery that has remained weak for four years running; a preceding decade of asset bubbles and loose credit, which produced only moderate economic growth; current rates which, at the zero bound, may be incapable of falling enough to spur greater investment in the economy; and falling or low wages and prices that discourage consumption.
Summers finds this new normal to be reminiscent of a Japan whose GDP today “is less than two-thirds of what most observers predicted a generation ago” despite many years of zero-bound rates.
Chillingly, he reports that “Japanese GDP was less disappointing in the five years after the bubbles burst at the end of the 1980s than U.S. GDP has been since 2008. U.S. GDP is more than 10% below what the Congressional Budget Office predicted before the financial crisis.”
Before addressing policy implications, Summers notes the possibility that an economy stuck in a stagnation trap simply won’t achieve escape velocity, noting the U.S. — like Japan in the 1990s — has seen many false dawns. Even if U.S. growth somehow accelerates at zero rates, he questions whether such growth can be sustained under normal rates.
Summers also suggests the possibility that policymakers are fighting against a new normal of structural constraints such as slowing labor force and productivity growth, declining consumption and increasing risk aversion.
