Podcast Center
Video Center
Webcasts
Resource Center
Events
October 01, 2013 at 07:05 AM
DETROIT (AP) — Hoping to stanch some of the red ink flowing from Detroit, its emergency manager is riling the workforce with a proposal to close the city’s pension plans to new employees by the end of the year and move the city to a 401(k)-style system that has become the norm in the private sector.
Detroit’s underfunded obligations of about $3.5 billion for pensions and $5.7 billion for retiree health coverage are part of the city’s $18 billion debt load and a major reason emergency manager Kevyn Orr filed for bankruptcy protection in July.
Now, he wants to end pensions for new employees and freeze benefits to about 18,000 members. Non-taxable annuity savings will be closed to new employees and no future contributions would be accepted after Orr’s proposed Dec. 31 “freeze date.”
Non-vested active system members also will be frozen out by Dec. 31.
“They took my wages and now they’re trying to take my pension,” said Mike Mulholland, vice president of American Federation of State, City and Municipal Employees. “All of our people are saying ‘what are they doing to us?’
“We’ve already given concession after concession, and now to be asked to give up more and be put in a defined contribution plan … they want to force us to take something where we have no security when we retire.”
Orr’s pension plan has to be approved by Michigan Treasurer Andy Dillon and is one of the strongest challenges to unions in the one-time organized labor stronghold.
It also is likely to continue the parade of court challenges by union leaders who say changes to pensions and bargained health care benefits violate Michigan’s Constitution.
But Orr counters that federal bankruptcy law trumps state law.
James McTevia, a Detroit-area turnaround expert, said he is not aware of a previous ruling on the matter, but adds it’s clear what Orr is trying to do.
“He is following the natural process for a reorganization,” said McTevia, of McTevia and Associates. “That sets up a mechanism to make changes to the entity’s debt structure. If the city doesn’t have the money to pay (into the pensions), what difference does the law make? If the city can’t do it, it can’t do it. That contract has to be rejected and another contract has to be entered into.”
A draft of the pension proposal was given last week to the General Retirement System, which represents about 20,500 active and retired city workers. AFSCME Council 25 spokesman Ed McNeil said unions have not received the draft.
In it, the city also would contribute five percent of the base pay of non-uniformed workers to the 401(k)-type pension plan. Overtime, bonuses and longevity pay will not be factored into compensation as they have been in the past. The city will make no contributions to a deferred compensation plan in which participant contributions and earnings on retirement money are tax-deferred.
