The ongoing battle by states to identify and reclaim funds from insurance companies in cases where policy beneficiaries did not get the funds is, on its face, a righteous one.
Insurers clearly owe the money and the evidence presented by the states and the outside firms they have retained to audit insurance firms have presented a truly compelling case.
The insurance companies did indeed have different or “asymmetrical” policies regarding use of the Social Security Death Master File regarding variable and fixed annuities sold with riders that provided monthly or quarterly benefits as compared to cases where persons with life insurance policies died and the beneficiaries did not come forward.
Moreover, insurance companies perhaps did not aggressively seek to provide cash or stock to either holders of small-face life policies or their beneficiaries in cases where the companies went public and stock was granted to policyholders.
Insurance companies clearly acted in their own best interest, and this has been going on for a long time.
However, within the context of 150 years of insurance regulation, it is a witch hunt.
Going on for decades
First, state regulators have known this was going on for decades.
There are detailed records of intermittent probes of this going back to the 1970s, if not before.
For example, a law upheld by a Kentucky early last month allows the state immediate access to the funds if beneficiaries don’t come forward.
According to long-time industry observers, states over the past 40 years have gradually reduced the time period allotted before escheatment, that is, when the money is turned over to the state, from the average of seven years in the 1970s.
In fact, during the last crisis, in the late 1990s, a model law passed by states seeking to rectify the situation won support only in two states.
Second, in all cases, the outrage prompted by the discovery that insurers had been less than aggressive in finding beneficiaries or escheating funds to the applicable states developed during periods of economic downturns.
Third, as noted by the American Council of Life Insurers and the Association of California Life and Health Insurance Companies in reaction to a press release prompted by a lawsuit filed by California Comptroller John Chiang on May 7 against a Texas insurance company that refused California access to its records, “The fact is, 99 percent of claims made for benefits are paid promptly — in the normal course of business.”