Podcast Center
Video Center
Webcasts
Resource Center
Events
November 21, 2012 at 07:00 PM
The 2012 Retirement & Politics Survey by Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America has found that those the survey defines as “transition boomers”—people between the ages of 55 and 65 who are less than 10 years away from retirement—see rising health care costs and Social Security as having the greatest impact on their retirement outlook. According to the survey, 67% of all transition boomers listed health care expenses as their top concern. Social Security ranked second at 53%. The survey was conducted this past Sept. 17-20 among a random sample of more than 1,200 baby boomers.
These fears are not without merit. Social Security and Medicare, which provide retirement income and health insurance coverage to American seniors, account for nearly half of all federal spending. We boomers (all of us, not just the transition boomers) are more than 75 million strong and the first of us turned the traditional retirement age of 65 just last year. Because there are so many of us, the ranks of the retired will continue to grow while the ranks of those supporting us—via paying for entitlements such as Medicare and Social Security—will continue to shrink.
We’re living longer too. In 1950, the average American lived for 68 years and more than 16 workers supported each retiree. Today, the average life expectancy is 78 and fewer than three workers support each retiree. Health care costs continue to explode higher as well.
For the vast majority of us, our retirement planning will mean little without the foundation provided by Social Security and Medicare. For low-income people, Social Security replaces up to 90% of covered wages. For higher income workers, those who earned the maximum Social Security wage for 35 years or so, the rate is only about 28%. Even so, unless Social Security and Medicare are shored up in a comprehensive and fiscally responsible manner, whatever else we boomers do to plan for retirement will be much less significant, if not irrelevant.
Each year the trustees of the Social Security and Medicare trust funds report on the current and projected financial status of the two programs. The most recent annual report yet again says that the finances of Medicare and Social Security are in serious trouble. The Congressional Budget Office projects that if Medicare retains its current structure, it will be bankrupt by 2022. Social Security’s chief actuary calculates that a 23% cut in benefits in 2036 will be required in order to maintain solvency of the Social Security Trust Fund.
Unfortunately, as the current election season demonstrates, there is little demand for Social Security and Medicare reform and little political will to move this issue forward. Not surprisingly, we want more and better benefits but we don’t want to have to pay for them. That said, a number of reform proposals have been put forward.
Proposed Social Security reforms range from relatively simple and limited adjustments (such as changing the benefit formula, tax rate and/or full retirement age) to more aggressive approaches (including means testing or even a diversion of workers’ payroll taxes into individually owned and dedicated private retirement investment accounts). Despite this wide range of Social Security reform proposals, the program can be shored up reasonably well with relatively modest changes. Change has to happen but no major overhaul is required.
Medicare, on the other hand, is much worse off and requires a much more aggressive response. The $38.6 trillion in unfunded benefits Medicare is expected to pay over the next 75 years equals $328,404.43 for each of the 117,538,000 households the Census Bureau says were living in the United States in 2010. The Medicare problem is a big one.
As Forbes has reported, the American Medical Association’s key policy committee, the Council on Medical Service, recently voted to endorse a Medicare reform plan that shares key traits with those proposed by the Romney campaign. Ironically, despite these similarities, the AMA Council’s report states that it came to this view based upon the advice of Bill Clinton’s former budget chief, Alice Rivlin.
