Close Close

Life Health > Health Insurance > Your Practice

What You Might Not Know About PPACA

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Yes, we’ve heard about the individual mandate — er, tax. A lot. And we know about Medicaid expansion. And the free birth control. And the state exchanges.

But there’s a lot to President Obama’s Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. After all, the law is 2,700 pages long. Its provisions — and overall effects — will not only change America’s health care landscape, but will have ripple effects in all other sectors.

See also: PPACA: A History

With regulations that began back in 2010, when the law was passed, and dozens more being implemented through 2018, there’s a lot to keep up with.

Here are some of the lesser known effects of the law.



Domestic violence help

Health care reform brings attention to a subject that usually doesn’t get much.

As of Aug. 1, 2012, the law requires that all insurance plans cover screening and counseling for domestic abuse, a provision found under preventive services for women’s health. (The other women’s health benefits are more widely known and include contraceptives and routine breast and pelvic exams, pap tests and prenatal care.)

The law also will also prevent domestic violence from being considered a “pre-existing condition.”

During a WedMD seminar in July, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius praised the PPACA for bringing attention to “an issue that’s off the radar.”

“It’s an unfortunate equal opportunity [issue] for victims—all races, ages, ethnic backgrounds and income levels are at one point or another victims of domestic violence. And often people feel ashamed or feel they’ve done something to cause the violence to occur,” Sebelius said. “But this is a situation in the health insurance market. Prior to the Affordable Care Act being law, it was legal for an insurance company to deny health coverage to a domestic violence victim because she was a domestic violence victim. Because that’s considered a pre-existing condition. That will no longer be legal by 2014.”

For victims of domestic violence, access to health care is critical, Lynn Rosenthal, White House adviser on violence against women, wrote in a blog post.

“They need treatment for immediate injuries and ongoing care for related health problems. They need to be able to talk to their health care provider about the cause of their injuries without fear of losing their health insurance,” she said. “Most importantly, they need our compassion and support.”

Domestic violence causes 2 million injuries and more than 1,200 deaths every year, Rosenthal says.

Photo credit: Nutdanai Apikhomboonwaroot

fake tanning lawFake tanners will pay

This has really been a hot-button issue, so to speak: Since July 1, 2010, Jersey Shore-looking wannabes have to pay a 10 percent tax every time they visit an indoor tanning service.

The reason for the tax is twofold: It makes a dent in the huge price tag of reform, while discouraging indoor tanning for health reasons. Indoor tanning has been linked with skin cancers including melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and cancers of the eye, says the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

But the tax has left tanning salon goers and owners outraged. And controversy hasn’t cooled down, either.

After the Supreme Court upheld PPACA back in June, the Indoor Tanning Association said, “As the thousands of business owners in this industry can attest, taxes have serious consequences for small businesses and their employees.”

“These businesses have paid this unfair tax for the past two years,” the association said, “and the results are in: Over 3,100 tanning businesses closed; over 35,000 jobs were destroyed. Since the tax went into effect, we estimate $145,000,000 has been taken out of the pockets of consumers and main street businesses and remitted to the federal government. “

Photo: “Tan Your Buns” owner caleb Hoag shows North Dakota State University student Miranda Fahey one of the tanning beds at his salon in Fargo, ND. (AP Photo/Dave Samson)



Smokers need not apply?

Under a provision of the law, smokers can be charged up to 50 percent more than nonsmokers for health insurance beginning in 2014. Current regulations allow companies to require workers who fail to meet specific standards to pay up to 20 percent of their insurance costs.

George Washington University law professor John Banzhaf helped persuade HHS and Congress to include the surcharges for smokers in the law. “The largest totally unnecessary expense that most corporations and employers bear—which unfortunately are largely passed along to their employees—are the unnecessary medical and other costs [of] smoking,” he says.

The surcharge is an effective method of discouraging smokers. It also may result in more wellness programs aimed at reducing the number of workers who light up, Banzhaf says.

But as an alternative, some employers have decided that the best way to avoid such costs is to not hire smokers at all. Though there are laws in place in some states prohibiting that, he argues they’re rarely enforced. Hiring only nonsmokers eliminates the time and money to establish a wellness program to help smokers.

Photo: Bill Longshaw

new mother

Workplace breastfeeding support

Breastfeeding advocacy groups are praising a provision in PPACA that supports women who chose to breastfeed.

The provision states that employers shall provide reasonable, unpaid break time and a private, non-bathroom location for an employee to express breast milk for her nursing child for up to one year after the child’s birth. Employers with less than 50 employees are not subject to the requirement if it would cause “undue hardship.”

“Mothers, babies and employers all win with breastfeeding support,” says Joan Younger Meek, a doctor and chair of the United States Breastfeeding Committee.

“Research clearly demonstrates the value of breastfeeding for the health of women and children, and medical experts agree with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in recommending exclusive breastfeeding for six months and continued breastfeeding for the first year of life and beyond,” Meek says. “But returning to work can be a major hurdle for new mothers struggling to balance working and breastfeeding without the simple support measures this law ensures.”

The group argues that in addition to recognizing the health benefits of breastfeeding, the new rule also financially benefits employers.

Meek says with minimal effort on the part of employers to provide “a clean place in privacy” and break times, there will be an impressive return on investment for employers that provide workplace lactation support, including lower health care costs, absenteeism and turnover rates.

Photo: David Castillo Dominici

caloric labels

Caloric reality

Have you ever ordered a Big Mac and large fries and thought to yourself, “I don’t even want to know how many calories this is”?

You’re out of luck from now on. Now you’ll be hit with caloric reality at every major chain restaurant.

The law requires restaurants with 20 or more locations to list calorie counts on menus, menu boards and even drive-throughs. The entire nutrition label—cholesterol, sodium, carbs, sugars, etc.—would also have to be available in writing upon request.

But there has been some contention with this. Some politicians and the Food Marketing Institute say the law can prove tricky because places like grocery stores serve ready-to-eat food, but caloric information can differ between stores and regions. It also can prove costly.

In June, the FMI endorsed new legislation that will support Congress’ original intent on federal restaurant menu labeling by ensuring that regulatory protocols intended for restaurants are not expanded to mainstream grocery stores, thus saving food retailers and their customers from unnecessary regulatory consequences costing in excess of $1 billion.

By the way, a Big Mac is 540 calories and 29 grams of fat; large fries are 500 calories and 25 grams of fat.

Photo: In this July 18, 2008 file photo, calories of each food item appear on a McDonalds drive-thru menu in New York. (AP Photo/Ed Ou, File)


Greater mental health attention

PPACA mandates coverage parity, putting mental health treatment on par with medical care, which means deductibles, copayments and doctor visits can’t be more restrictive for mental illnesses than medical and surgical coverage.

Mental health advocates praise the changes.

“I would say no single piece of legislation has had as much of a potential impact on the lives of people with mental illness as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” says Bill Emmet, a mental health advocate who works as a consultant and senior policy adviser in Los Angeles.

“The end of restrictions on coverage of people with pre-existing conditions will have a disproportionate benefit for people with mental illnesses, resulting not only in greater access to care for their mental health disorders, but—more important—in better overall health, as many will have access to health insurance for the first time,” he says.

Similarly, Emmet says, the provision allowing young people to remain on their parents’ insurance plans through age 26 will have a great impact because “mental illnesses often reveal themselves just as young people are making their way in the world, and this provision will ensure they have coverage at a critical time for early intervention and treatment.”

According to the CDC, about one in four Americans have a mental illness. Additionally, people with a mental illness are more prone to other costly problems: They are more than twice as likely to smoke cigarettes and more than 50 percent more likely to be obese compared to the rest of the population.

Photo credit: Ambro


A pricier pizza

Papa John’s CEO John Schnatter got national attention in August when he said that health reform will cause consumers to pay more for their pizza.

He estimates that the law will cost 11 to 14 cents more per pizza, or 15 to 20 cents per order. That’s because, under the PPACA, the company will have to offer health care coverage to more of its 16,500 total employees or pay a penalty to the government.

“We’re not supportive of Obamacare, like most businesses in our industry,” Schnatter said. “But our business model and unit economics are about as ideal as you can get for a food company to absorb Obamacare.”

The National Restaurant Association said the law may adversely affect restaurants’ ability to maintain already slim profit margins because it requires companies of more than 50 employees to provide affordable health insurance.

Papa John’s wasn’t the only restaurant to bemoan costs that will come due to health reform. Chains such as White Castle, McDonalds, Burger King, Quiznos and Dunkin’ Donuts have all expressed concern the law may hurt their bottom line.


Your flexible spending account

A popular consumer-driven health care tactic is also changing, due to the PPACA.

As of Jan. 1, 2011, flexible spending accounts may no longer be used to purchase over-the-counter drugs or medicines. Most retailers can identify items that could be reimbursed at the time of purchase, so the flexible spending account debit cards will pay for only the eligible items, Cigna says. Individuals must pay for over-the-counter drugs and medicines another way.

But the most significant change to FSAs under the law will be the implementation of the $2,500 cap on health care FSA contributions beginning in 2013, says Jody Dietel, chief compliance officer at WageWorks and executive director of Save Flexible Spending Plans, an advocacy campaign to protect the accessibility and use of flexible spending accounts.

Previously there was no cap.

“While the new cap may require an adjustment from FSA participants, the accounts are still a can’t-miss savings opportunity,” she says.

Photo: Generic over the counter medicines are seen in Philadelphia on Monday, Feb. 25, 2008. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

For more on PPACA, see:

PPACA: A History

PPACA Decision: The PDF, with Interesting Parts Highlighted

5 Things I Learned from the Supreme Court Ruling


© 2023 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.