Podcast Center
Video Center
Webcasts
Resource Center
Events
March 14, 2012 at 03:32 PM
Developing closer contact with clients and winning new ones is paramount to investment advisors, and in many ways these goals are made easier with the advent of social networking. But for every adventurous advisor that is tweeting on the latest economic or market news, or improving interactions with clients or prospects via Facebook, there are many others who fear overstepping the regulations currently affecting social networking, or simply wish to avoid burdensome recordkeeping requirements. Further complicating matters is that the alerts and guidelines issued by regulators are usually complex and often seem to raise more issues than they settle.
The latest AdvisorBenchmarking report indicates that while a sizeable number of advisors surveyed say they currently use social media, most do not—mainly because of uncertainty around navigating compliance issues. Success stories, however, abound, like the adviser described in a recent Wall Street Journal article who garnered Facebook friends through his family’s progress report of an adoption of a three-year-old El Salvador boy, or the adviser who uses Facebook to discover the leisure pursuits and passions of his clients. In many ways, the main value in social media so far is establishing closer personal connections with prospects and clients.
According to the latest AdvisorBenchmarking report, only 16% of advisors surveyed use social media currently, while another 31% say they plan to, probably as soon as the rules of the road become clear. Other surveys confirm that advisors are eager to use social media, if only to demonstrate to clients or prospects, especially younger, more tech-savvy ones, that they are technologically proficient and adaptable. Many advisors believe it also differentiates them from competitors.
The major concerns with social media are that advisors are not sure how to navigate the compliance issues (47%) and that they don’t know how to measure social media’s effectiveness (27%). These were also the top categories of concerns in the prior AdvisorBenchmarking survey.
In a regulatory environment where any mass communication can be seen as a sales piece, one would expect compliance review to be as stringent as it is with other types of sales and marketing collateral. But the nature of social media is that it’s both mass market and spontaneous. Putting a compliance filter on such communications is bound to be challenging. It’s also difficult to quantify how much and in what ways social media helps the client acquisition process. What advisors do know is that it takes time. Lacking staff to manage and maintain a social media presence registered the largest increase among reasons RIAs not using social media.
